[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Tegra2: Change mach-type to MACH_TYPE_SEABOARD due to mach-types.h update

Tom Warren
2011-03-28T16:27:14Z

Albert,

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr> wrote:
> Le 24/03/2011 16:08, Tom Warren a ?crit :
>>
>> Albert,
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Albert ARIBAUD<albert.aribaud@free.fr>
>> ?wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 22/03/2011 20:27, Tom Warren a ?crit :
>>>>
>>>> Albert,
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Albert ARIBAUD<albert.aribaud@free.fr>
>>>> ?wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 23/02/2011 21:03, Tom Warren a ?crit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, I'm an idiot. I see now that I needed to add -n to format-patch to
>>>>>> add the numbering to the [PATCH] header.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry for the noise - resending now with the corrected patchset.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tom
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, for a single patch, you don't need to generate numbers, nor a
>>>>> cover letter (the 0/N message).
>>>>
>>>> Is the current patch OK as is? It's a simple one-line change.
>>>
>>> I guess so. As soon as I get confirmation from Wolfgang that board
>>> patches
>>> can go through any tree, I'll apply it as a bugfix to master.
>
>> Great. Thanks!
>
> Applied to u-boot-arm/master.
>
>> Also, I saw your 'patches pending before release?' message. ?Have my
>> Tegra 'A9 CPU' patches been applied to arm master? I'm still a little
>> confused about the timing of the merge window vs. the release, and I'm
>> not sure if the full set of Tegra patches will be in the next release.
>
> Sorry, I can't get them in in the upcoming release as I barely have time to
> sort the pull req for today, but I'll get them on u-boot-arm/master as soon
> as I can after that, so they'll be available on the ARM tree until the
> following release, where they'll move to the mainline one.
>
Excellent - that's all I can ask. Thanks!

Tom
> Amicalement,
> --
> Albert.
>