From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert ARIBAUD Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:01:40 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] ARM: Incorrect ROM protection range? In-Reply-To: <20110224134139.92BD0D5AF8C@gemini.denx.de> References: <4D660030.409@free.fr> <4D6609C5.3040203@denx.de> <4D6611A7.5050802@free.fr> <20110224093925.90139146940@gemini.denx.de> <4D664801.2000001@free.fr> <4D665969.1@free.fr> <20110224134139.92BD0D5AF8C@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <4D6680E4.1070405@free.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Le 24/02/2011 14:41, Wolfgang Denk a ?crit : > Dear Albert ARIBAUD, > > In message<4D665969.1@free.fr> you wrote: >> >> Thanks for pointing this out: indeed, _end is actually used as BSS's >> end, not as the image's end -- I did not find any other use of it. >> >> However, not only ARM uses _end: how do we want to handle the change >> overall? > > Sounds as if we need a little fix/cleanup for _all_ systems... Do you mean a first commit to turn _end into _bss_end everywhere in U-Boot, then a second commit to reintroduce _end and fix the issue with monitor protection? Or even maybe a single commit for both? > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk Amicalement, -- Albert.