From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] ARM: MX31: print WRSR to indicate the source of the last reset
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:07:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D78E945.1080407@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299754388-31648-1-git-send-email-agust@denx.de>
On 03/10/2011 11:53 AM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> Add output of the WRSR register content while booting so that
> we can see the source of the last reset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Hi Antolij,
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/mx31/generic.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/mx31/generic.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/mx31/generic.c
> index 1415d6c..788faed 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/mx31/generic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/mx31/generic.c
> @@ -93,8 +93,10 @@ void mx31_gpio_mux(unsigned long mode)
> #if defined(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO)
> int print_cpuinfo (void)
> {
> - printf("CPU: Freescale i.MX31 at %d MHz\n",
> - mx31_get_mcu_main_clk() / 1000000);
> + struct wdog_regs *wdog = (struct wdog_regs *)WDOG_BASE;
> +
> + printf("CPU: Freescale i.MX31 at %d MHz (WRSR=0x%04x)\n",
> + mx31_get_mcu_main_clk() / 1000000, wdog->wrsr);
Why is it better to use the wrsr register instead of the rcsr register ?
We are actually using the rcsr register for other i.MX processors
(MX51/MX53/MX35). And if we want to print the reset cause, I think it
should be better to write directly the cause as string instead of the
register value.
I do not think printing the reset cause should be implemented in
print_cpuinfo(), because it manages a different issue (reset cause
against CPU information). The print_cpuinfo() should have only CPU
related values, as clock values, and so on, as it is implemented now for
this and other processors. Better to add a different function for the
reset cause.
Best regards,
Stefano Babic
--
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-10 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-10 10:53 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] ARM: MX31: print WRSR to indicate the source of the last reset Anatolij Gustschin
2011-03-10 13:47 ` Fabio Estevam
2011-03-12 13:22 ` Anatolij Gustschin
2011-03-10 15:07 ` Stefano Babic [this message]
2011-03-12 13:15 ` Anatolij Gustschin
2011-03-14 11:55 ` Stefano Babic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D78E945.1080407@denx.de \
--to=sbabic@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox