From: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@googlemail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/6] Mips: Move content of arch/mips/cpu to arch/mips/cpu/mips32
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 01:48:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D7C147A.5060501@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D7B8686.9060101@pobox.com>
Hi Shinya,
On 03/12/2011 03:43 PM, Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
> On 3/9/11 10:16 PM, daniel.schwierzeck at googlemail.com wrote:
>> All current CPUs and SoCs are based on Mips32 arch. The complete
>
> Is that true? What about purple SoC? IIUC It's based on MIPS 5Kc
> and capable of 64-bit, which MIPS32 is 32-bit only architecture.
that was an assumption. I could not find any information about Purple.
This patch series is a suggestion. Maybe there are better approaches
like arch/mips/cpu/{mips4k|mips5k|mips24k|...|octeon}.
>
>> code resides in the global arch/mips/cpu directory. This is not
>> suitable if other Mips architectures like Mips64 or Octeon should
>> be supported in the future.
>
> Just for the record.
>
> Personally, Octeon is sort of a special case. It's based on MIPS64
> architecture, and definitely a MIPS SoC, but not usual MIPS machine.
> As Aaron already mentioned before, we have very few files sharable
> with other MIPS machines even in the Linux kernel case. I think it
> will take long time the Octeon port gets merged to upstream, regard-
> less of my opinions, because they have a lot of things need to be
> resolved prior to Octeon itself.
My original intention was cleaning up the MIPS CPU directory as
preparation to support new SoCs. I included this patch because Aaron
asked for this separation some weeks ago but no one answered or commented ;)
However I posted this series to get some feedback if such a change is
wanted or acceptable. If so I prepare a new patch series. At least I
hope the SoC separation is acceptable.
Cheers,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-13 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-09 13:16 [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Mips: Refactoring of CPU and SoC code daniel.schwierzeck at googlemail.com
2011-03-09 13:16 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/6] Mips: Move content of arch/mips/cpu to arch/mips/cpu/mips32 daniel.schwierzeck at googlemail.com
2011-03-12 14:43 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2011-03-13 0:48 ` Daniel Schwierzeck [this message]
2011-03-13 22:44 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-03-14 12:15 ` Daniel Schwierzeck
2011-03-14 12:41 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-03-15 0:29 ` Aaron Williams
2011-03-09 13:16 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/6] Mips: Purple: Adapt u-boot.lds to changed CPU directory layout daniel.schwierzeck at googlemail.com
2011-03-12 14:27 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2011-03-09 13:16 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/6] Mips: IncaIP: Move all IncaIP specific code to separate subdirectory daniel.schwierzeck at googlemail.com
2011-03-09 13:16 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 4/6] Mips: Purple: Move all Purple " daniel.schwierzeck at googlemail.com
2011-03-09 13:16 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 5/6] Mips: Au1x00: Move all Au1x00 " daniel.schwierzeck at googlemail.com
2011-03-09 13:16 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 6/6] Mips: Update setting of endianess and CPU optimization flags daniel.schwierzeck at googlemail.com
2011-03-12 14:58 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Mips: Refactoring of CPU and SoC code Shinya Kuribayashi
2011-03-12 15:00 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D7C147A.5060501@gmail.com \
--to=daniel.schwierzeck@googlemail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox