* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus @ 2011-03-18 4:02 Aaron Williams 2011-03-18 7:12 ` Rogan Dawes 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Aaron Williams @ 2011-03-18 4:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi, I am running into issues in that the CFI code is broken for flash with an 8- bit bus. The problem is that the CFI code uses the wrong addresses for 8-bits vs 16-bits. The CFI function flash_map incorrectly calculates the byte offset with Spansion flash. In our case, we have an 8-bit Spansion S29GL-N MirrorBit flash chip on an 8- bit bus. According to the data sheet, in 8-bit mode the first unlock address is 0xAAA and the second is 0x555. Basically all of the addresses are approximately double what they are in 16-bit mode. Most of the addresses in the CFI code are wrong for 8-bit mode. They should be as follows: unlock1: 0xAAA unlock2: 0x555 CFI Query: 0xAA Offset Device ID: 0x02, 0x1c, 0x1e Offset Silicon Sector Factory Protect: 0x6 Sector protect verify (sector address) + 4 The problem is that the dectection code detects (incorrectly) that we're an 8- bit device on a 16-bit bus when in fact it's an 8-bit bus. For 16-bits, it's: unlock1: 0x555 unlock2: 0x2aa CFI Query: 0x55 Offset Device ID: 0x1, 0x0e, 0x0f Now, in 16-bit mode these addresses should be effectively doubled so they should look to be the same to software as I understand it. This is all taken from the datasheet. Note that the CFI code works fine with the flash hooked up as 16-bit on a 16- bit bus. If it's an 8-bit flash on a 16-bit bus then the addresses should be doubled. flash detect cfi fwc addr 1ec00000 cmd f0 f0 8bit x 8 bit fwc addr 1ec00000 cmd ff ff 8bit x 8 bit fwc addr 1ec00055 cmd 98 98 8bit x 8 bit <== should be 0x1ec000AA is= cmd 51(Q) addr 1ec00010 is= 0 51 fwc addr 1ec00000 cmd f0 f0 8bit x 8 bit fwc addr 1ec00000 cmd ff ff 8bit x 8 bit fwc addr 1ec00555 cmd 98 98 8bit x 8 bit is= cmd 51(Q) addr 1ec00010 is= 0 51 fwc addr 1ec00000 cmd f0 f0f0 16bit x 8 bit fwc addr 1ec00000 cmd ff ffff 16bit x 8 bit fwc addr 1ec000aa cmd 98 9898 16bit x 8 bit is= cmd 51(Q) addr 1ec00020 is= 5151 5151 is= cmd 52(R) addr 1ec00022 is= 5252 5252 is= cmd 59(Y) addr 1ec00024 is= 5959 5959 device interface is 2 found port 2 chip 1 port 16 bits chip 8 bits 00 : 51 52 59 02 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 27 36 00 00 06 QRY..@.....'6... 10 : 06 09 13 03 05 03 02 18 02 00 06 00 01 7f 00 00 ................ 20 : 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 13 e8 ................ fwc addr 1ec00000 cmd f0 f0f0 16bit x 8 bit fwc addr 1ec01554 cmd aa aaaa 16bit x 8 bit fwc addr 1ec00aaa cmd 55 5555 16bit x 8 bit fwc addr 1ec01554 cmd 90 9090 16bit x 8 bit fwc addr 1ec00000 cmd f0 f0f0 16bit x 8 bit fwc addr 1ec000aa cmd 98 9898 16bit x 8 bit manufacturer is 2 manufacturer id is 0x0 device id is 0x3f device id2 is 0x0 cfi version is 0x3133 size_ratio 1 port 16 bits chip 8 bits found 1 erase regions erase region 0: 0x0200007f erase_region_count = 128 erase_region_size = 131072 fwc addr 1ec00000 cmd f0 f0 8bit x 8 bit fwc addr 1fbe0000 cmd 70 70 8bit x 8 bit flash_is_busy: 0 Flash: 16 MiB -Aaron ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus 2011-03-18 4:02 [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus Aaron Williams @ 2011-03-18 7:12 ` Rogan Dawes 2011-03-18 7:48 ` Aaron Williams 2011-03-24 3:07 ` Aaron Williams 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Rogan Dawes @ 2011-03-18 7:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 2011/03/18 6:02 AM, Aaron Williams wrote: > Hi, > > I am running into issues in that the CFI code is broken for flash with an 8- > bit bus. The problem is that the CFI code uses the wrong addresses for 8-bits > vs 16-bits. > > The CFI function flash_map incorrectly calculates the byte offset with > Spansion flash. > > In our case, we have an 8-bit Spansion S29GL-N MirrorBit flash chip on an 8- > bit bus. > > According to the data sheet, in 8-bit mode the first unlock address is 0xAAA > and the second is 0x555. Basically all of the addresses are approximately > double what they are in 16-bit mode. > > Most of the addresses in the CFI code are wrong for 8-bit mode. > > They should be as follows: > unlock1: 0xAAA > unlock2: 0x555 > CFI Query: 0xAA > > Offset Device ID: 0x02, 0x1c, 0x1e > Offset Silicon Sector Factory Protect: 0x6 > Sector protect verify (sector address) + 4 > > The problem is that the dectection code detects (incorrectly) that we're an 8- > bit device on a 16-bit bus when in fact it's an 8-bit bus. > > For 16-bits, it's: > > unlock1: 0x555 > unlock2: 0x2aa > CFI Query: 0x55 > Offset Device ID: 0x1, 0x0e, 0x0f > > Now, in 16-bit mode these addresses should be effectively doubled so they > should look to be the same to software as I understand it. > > This is all taken from the datasheet. > > Note that the CFI code works fine with the flash hooked up as 16-bit on a 16- > bit bus. > > If it's an 8-bit flash on a 16-bit bus then the addresses should be doubled. > > > -Aaron Hi Aaron, Does this patch (originally by Stefan Roese) work for you? I also need it for the DNS323 port. FWIW, mine is also a Spansion flash (S29GL064M90TFIR4), although I am not 100% sure of the layout and connectivity. Rogan --- drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c index dd394a8..74e9ade 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c @@ -291,6 +291,9 @@ static inline uchar flash_read_uchar (flash_info_t * info, uint offset) uchar *cp; uchar retval; +#if 1 // test-only + offset = offset * 2; +#endif cp = flash_map (info, 0, offset); #if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN) || defined(CONFIG_SYS_WRITE_SWAPPED_DATA) retval = flash_read8(cp); @@ -308,6 +311,9 @@ static inline ushort flash_read_word (flash_info_t * info, uint offset) { ushort *addr, retval; +#if 1 // test-only + offset = offset * 2; +#endif addr = flash_map (info, 0, offset); retval = flash_read16 (addr); flash_unmap (info, 0, offset, addr); @@ -328,6 +334,9 @@ static ulong flash_read_long (flash_info_t * info, flash_sect_t sect, #ifdef DEBUG int x; #endif +#if 1 // test-only + offset = offset * 2; +#endif addr = flash_map (info, sect, offset); #ifdef DEBUG @@ -363,6 +372,9 @@ void flash_write_cmd (flash_info_t * info, flash_sect_t sect, void *addr; cfiword_t cword; +#if 1 // test-only + offset = offset * 2; +#endif addr = flash_map (info, sect, offset); flash_make_cmd (info, cmd, &cword); switch (info->portwidth) { @@ -420,6 +432,9 @@ static int flash_isequal (flash_info_t * info, flash_sect_t sect, cfiword_t cword; int retval; +#if 1 // test-only + offset = offset * 2; +#endif addr = flash_map (info, sect, offset); flash_make_cmd (info, cmd, &cword); @@ -1762,6 +1777,7 @@ static int __flash_detect_cfi (flash_info_t * info, struct cfi_qry *qry) info->addr_unlock1 = 0x555; info->addr_unlock2 = 0x2aa; +#if 0 // test-only /* * modify the unlock address if we are * in compatibility mode @@ -1776,6 +1792,7 @@ static int __flash_detect_cfi (flash_info_t * info, struct cfi_qry *qry) info->addr_unlock1 = 0xaaa; info->addr_unlock2 = 0x555; } +#endif info->name = "CFI conformant"; return 1; @@ -1942,11 +1959,13 @@ ulong flash_get_size (phys_addr_t base, int banknum) debug ("cfi version is 0x%04x\n", info->cfi_version); size_ratio = info->portwidth / info->chipwidth; +#if 0 // test-only /* if the chip is x8/x16 reduce the ratio by half */ if ((info->interface == FLASH_CFI_X8X16) && (info->chipwidth == FLASH_CFI_BY8)) { size_ratio >>= 1; } +#endif debug ("size_ratio %d port %d bits chip %d bits\n", size_ratio, info->portwidth << CFI_FLASH_SHIFT_WIDTH, info->chipwidth << CFI_FLASH_SHIFT_WIDTH); @@ -2034,12 +2053,13 @@ ulong flash_get_size (phys_addr_t base, int banknum) /* round up when converting to ms */ info->write_tout = (tmp + 999) / 1000; info->flash_id = FLASH_MAN_CFI; +#if 0 if ((info->interface == FLASH_CFI_X8X16) && (info->chipwidth == FLASH_CFI_BY8)) { /* XXX - Need to test on x8/x16 in parallel. */ info->portwidth >>= 1; } - +#endif flash_write_cmd (info, 0, 0, info->cmd_reset); } -- 1.7.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus 2011-03-18 7:12 ` Rogan Dawes @ 2011-03-18 7:48 ` Aaron Williams 2011-03-24 3:07 ` Aaron Williams 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Aaron Williams @ 2011-03-18 7:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot I don't think that will work. Multiplying the offsets by two won't always work (i.e. offset 2AA * 2 != 555). I think this will require a more substantial fix. I started working on something but it may take me a few days, though I have both an 8-bit and a 16-bit board to play with (though no 8-bit chip on a 16-bit bus). -Aaron On 03/18/2011 12:12 AM, Rogan Dawes wrote: > On 2011/03/18 6:02 AM, Aaron Williams wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am running into issues in that the CFI code is broken for flash with an 8- >> bit bus. The problem is that the CFI code uses the wrong addresses for 8-bits >> vs 16-bits. >> >> The CFI function flash_map incorrectly calculates the byte offset with >> Spansion flash. >> >> In our case, we have an 8-bit Spansion S29GL-N MirrorBit flash chip on an 8- >> bit bus. >> >> According to the data sheet, in 8-bit mode the first unlock address is 0xAAA >> and the second is 0x555. Basically all of the addresses are approximately >> double what they are in 16-bit mode. >> >> Most of the addresses in the CFI code are wrong for 8-bit mode. >> >> They should be as follows: >> unlock1: 0xAAA >> unlock2: 0x555 >> CFI Query: 0xAA >> >> Offset Device ID: 0x02, 0x1c, 0x1e >> Offset Silicon Sector Factory Protect: 0x6 >> Sector protect verify (sector address) + 4 >> >> The problem is that the dectection code detects (incorrectly) that we're an 8- >> bit device on a 16-bit bus when in fact it's an 8-bit bus. >> >> For 16-bits, it's: >> >> unlock1: 0x555 >> unlock2: 0x2aa >> CFI Query: 0x55 >> Offset Device ID: 0x1, 0x0e, 0x0f >> >> Now, in 16-bit mode these addresses should be effectively doubled so they >> should look to be the same to software as I understand it. >> >> This is all taken from the datasheet. >> >> Note that the CFI code works fine with the flash hooked up as 16-bit on a 16- >> bit bus. >> >> If it's an 8-bit flash on a 16-bit bus then the addresses should be doubled. >> >> -Aaron > Hi Aaron, > > Does this patch (originally by Stefan Roese) work for you? I also need > it for the DNS323 port. FWIW, mine is also a Spansion flash > (S29GL064M90TFIR4), although I am not 100% sure of the layout and > connectivity. > > Rogan > > --- > drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c > index dd394a8..74e9ade 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c > @@ -291,6 +291,9 @@ static inline uchar flash_read_uchar (flash_info_t * > info, uint offset) > uchar *cp; > uchar retval; > > +#if 1 // test-only > + offset = offset * 2; > +#endif > cp = flash_map (info, 0, offset); > #if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN) || defined(CONFIG_SYS_WRITE_SWAPPED_DATA) > retval = flash_read8(cp); > @@ -308,6 +311,9 @@ static inline ushort flash_read_word (flash_info_t * > info, uint offset) > { > ushort *addr, retval; > > +#if 1 // test-only > + offset = offset * 2; > +#endif > addr = flash_map (info, 0, offset); > retval = flash_read16 (addr); > flash_unmap (info, 0, offset, addr); > @@ -328,6 +334,9 @@ static ulong flash_read_long (flash_info_t * info, > flash_sect_t sect, > #ifdef DEBUG > int x; > #endif > +#if 1 // test-only > + offset = offset * 2; > +#endif > addr = flash_map (info, sect, offset); > > #ifdef DEBUG > @@ -363,6 +372,9 @@ void flash_write_cmd (flash_info_t * info, > flash_sect_t sect, > void *addr; > cfiword_t cword; > > +#if 1 // test-only > + offset = offset * 2; > +#endif > addr = flash_map (info, sect, offset); > flash_make_cmd (info, cmd, &cword); > switch (info->portwidth) { > @@ -420,6 +432,9 @@ static int flash_isequal (flash_info_t * info, > flash_sect_t sect, > cfiword_t cword; > int retval; > > +#if 1 // test-only > + offset = offset * 2; > +#endif > addr = flash_map (info, sect, offset); > flash_make_cmd (info, cmd, &cword); > > @@ -1762,6 +1777,7 @@ static int __flash_detect_cfi (flash_info_t * > info, struct cfi_qry *qry) > info->addr_unlock1 = 0x555; > info->addr_unlock2 = 0x2aa; > > +#if 0 // test-only > /* > * modify the unlock address if we are > * in compatibility mode > @@ -1776,6 +1792,7 @@ static int __flash_detect_cfi (flash_info_t * > info, struct cfi_qry *qry) > info->addr_unlock1 = 0xaaa; > info->addr_unlock2 = 0x555; > } > +#endif > > info->name = "CFI conformant"; > return 1; > @@ -1942,11 +1959,13 @@ ulong flash_get_size (phys_addr_t base, int banknum) > debug ("cfi version is 0x%04x\n", info->cfi_version); > > size_ratio = info->portwidth / info->chipwidth; > +#if 0 // test-only > /* if the chip is x8/x16 reduce the ratio by half */ > if ((info->interface == FLASH_CFI_X8X16) > && (info->chipwidth == FLASH_CFI_BY8)) { > size_ratio >>= 1; > } > +#endif > debug ("size_ratio %d port %d bits chip %d bits\n", > size_ratio, info->portwidth << CFI_FLASH_SHIFT_WIDTH, > info->chipwidth << CFI_FLASH_SHIFT_WIDTH); > @@ -2034,12 +2053,13 @@ ulong flash_get_size (phys_addr_t base, int banknum) > /* round up when converting to ms */ > info->write_tout = (tmp + 999) / 1000; > info->flash_id = FLASH_MAN_CFI; > +#if 0 > if ((info->interface == FLASH_CFI_X8X16) && > (info->chipwidth == FLASH_CFI_BY8)) { > /* XXX - Need to test on x8/x16 in parallel. */ > info->portwidth >>= 1; > } > - > +#endif > flash_write_cmd (info, 0, 0, info->cmd_reset); > } > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus 2011-03-18 7:12 ` Rogan Dawes 2011-03-18 7:48 ` Aaron Williams @ 2011-03-24 3:07 ` Aaron Williams 2011-03-24 5:20 ` Stefan Roese 2011-03-24 16:59 ` Rogan Dawes 1 sibling, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Aaron Williams @ 2011-03-24 3:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot I have it working on our 8-bit boards properly now, though I've only done some limited testing. I basically put in the correct addresses into cfi_flash.h and updated various addresses for 8-bit support. The problem was that the CFI code was written using the 16-bit addresses which don't work for an 8-bit bus. I added a mask which is used to calculate the correct address for 16 and 32- bit busses. I have only been able to test with 8-bit and 16-bit Spansion devices though. -Aaron On Friday, March 18, 2011 12:12:22 AM Rogan Dawes wrote: > On 2011/03/18 6:02 AM, Aaron Williams wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am running into issues in that the CFI code is broken for flash with an > > 8- bit bus. The problem is that the CFI code uses the wrong addresses > > for 8-bits vs 16-bits. > > > > The CFI function flash_map incorrectly calculates the byte offset with > > Spansion flash. > > > > In our case, we have an 8-bit Spansion S29GL-N MirrorBit flash chip on an > > 8- bit bus. > > > > According to the data sheet, in 8-bit mode the first unlock address is > > 0xAAA and the second is 0x555. Basically all of the addresses are > > approximately double what they are in 16-bit mode. > > > > Most of the addresses in the CFI code are wrong for 8-bit mode. > > > > They should be as follows: > > unlock1: 0xAAA > > unlock2: 0x555 > > CFI Query: 0xAA > > > > Offset Device ID: 0x02, 0x1c, 0x1e > > Offset Silicon Sector Factory Protect: 0x6 > > Sector protect verify (sector address) + 4 > > > > The problem is that the dectection code detects (incorrectly) that we're > > an 8- bit device on a 16-bit bus when in fact it's an 8-bit bus. > > > > For 16-bits, it's: > > > > unlock1: 0x555 > > unlock2: 0x2aa > > CFI Query: 0x55 > > Offset Device ID: 0x1, 0x0e, 0x0f > > > > Now, in 16-bit mode these addresses should be effectively doubled so they > > should look to be the same to software as I understand it. > > > > This is all taken from the datasheet. > > > > Note that the CFI code works fine with the flash hooked up as 16-bit on a > > 16- bit bus. > > > > If it's an 8-bit flash on a 16-bit bus then the addresses should be > > doubled. > > > > > > > > -Aaron > > Hi Aaron, > > Does this patch (originally by Stefan Roese) work for you? I also need > it for the DNS323 port. FWIW, mine is also a Spansion flash > (S29GL064M90TFIR4), although I am not 100% sure of the layout and > connectivity. > > Rogan > > --- > drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c > index dd394a8..74e9ade 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c > @@ -291,6 +291,9 @@ static inline uchar flash_read_uchar (flash_info_t * > info, uint offset) > uchar *cp; > uchar retval; > > +#if 1 // test-only > + offset = offset * 2; > +#endif > cp = flash_map (info, 0, offset); > #if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN) || defined(CONFIG_SYS_WRITE_SWAPPED_DATA) > retval = flash_read8(cp); > @@ -308,6 +311,9 @@ static inline ushort flash_read_word (flash_info_t * > info, uint offset) > { > ushort *addr, retval; > > +#if 1 // test-only > + offset = offset * 2; > +#endif > addr = flash_map (info, 0, offset); > retval = flash_read16 (addr); > flash_unmap (info, 0, offset, addr); > @@ -328,6 +334,9 @@ static ulong flash_read_long (flash_info_t * info, > flash_sect_t sect, > #ifdef DEBUG > int x; > #endif > +#if 1 // test-only > + offset = offset * 2; > +#endif > addr = flash_map (info, sect, offset); > > #ifdef DEBUG > @@ -363,6 +372,9 @@ void flash_write_cmd (flash_info_t * info, > flash_sect_t sect, > void *addr; > cfiword_t cword; > > +#if 1 // test-only > + offset = offset * 2; > +#endif > addr = flash_map (info, sect, offset); > flash_make_cmd (info, cmd, &cword); > switch (info->portwidth) { > @@ -420,6 +432,9 @@ static int flash_isequal (flash_info_t * info, > flash_sect_t sect, > cfiword_t cword; > int retval; > > +#if 1 // test-only > + offset = offset * 2; > +#endif > addr = flash_map (info, sect, offset); > flash_make_cmd (info, cmd, &cword); > > @@ -1762,6 +1777,7 @@ static int __flash_detect_cfi (flash_info_t * > info, struct cfi_qry *qry) > info->addr_unlock1 = 0x555; > info->addr_unlock2 = 0x2aa; > > +#if 0 // test-only > /* > * modify the unlock address if we are > * in compatibility mode > @@ -1776,6 +1792,7 @@ static int __flash_detect_cfi (flash_info_t * > info, struct cfi_qry *qry) > info->addr_unlock1 = 0xaaa; > info->addr_unlock2 = 0x555; > } > +#endif > > info->name = "CFI conformant"; > return 1; > @@ -1942,11 +1959,13 @@ ulong flash_get_size (phys_addr_t base, int > banknum) debug ("cfi version is 0x%04x\n", info->cfi_version); > > size_ratio = info->portwidth / info->chipwidth; > +#if 0 // test-only > /* if the chip is x8/x16 reduce the ratio by half */ > if ((info->interface == FLASH_CFI_X8X16) > && (info->chipwidth == FLASH_CFI_BY8)) { > size_ratio >>= 1; > } > +#endif > debug ("size_ratio %d port %d bits chip %d bits\n", > size_ratio, info->portwidth << CFI_FLASH_SHIFT_WIDTH, > info->chipwidth << CFI_FLASH_SHIFT_WIDTH); > @@ -2034,12 +2053,13 @@ ulong flash_get_size (phys_addr_t base, int > banknum) /* round up when converting to ms */ > info->write_tout = (tmp + 999) / 1000; > info->flash_id = FLASH_MAN_CFI; > +#if 0 > if ((info->interface == FLASH_CFI_X8X16) && > (info->chipwidth == FLASH_CFI_BY8)) { > /* XXX - Need to test on x8/x16 in parallel. */ > info->portwidth >>= 1; > } > - > +#endif > flash_write_cmd (info, 0, 0, info->cmd_reset); > } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus 2011-03-24 3:07 ` Aaron Williams @ 2011-03-24 5:20 ` Stefan Roese 2011-03-24 16:59 ` Rogan Dawes 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Stefan Roese @ 2011-03-24 5:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Aaron, On Thursday 24 March 2011 04:07:21 Aaron Williams wrote: > I have it working on our 8-bit boards properly now, though I've only done > some limited testing. Good. > I basically put in the correct addresses into cfi_flash.h and updated > various addresses for 8-bit support. The problem was that the CFI code was > written using the 16-bit addresses which don't work for an 8-bit bus. > > I added a mask which is used to calculate the correct address for 16 and > 32- bit busses. I have only been able to test with 8-bit and 16-bit > Spansion devices though. Please post the patch on the list. I'll try to test it on some of my systems as well. Thanks. Cheers, Stefan -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-0 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus 2011-03-24 3:07 ` Aaron Williams 2011-03-24 5:20 ` Stefan Roese @ 2011-03-24 16:59 ` Rogan Dawes 2011-03-26 6:32 ` Aaron Williams 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Rogan Dawes @ 2011-03-24 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 2011/03/24 5:07 AM, Aaron Williams wrote: > I have it working on our 8-bit boards properly now, though I've only done some > limited testing. > > I basically put in the correct addresses into cfi_flash.h and updated various > addresses for 8-bit support. The problem was that the CFI code was written > using the 16-bit addresses which don't work for an 8-bit bus. > > I added a mask which is used to calculate the correct address for 16 and 32- > bit busses. I have only been able to test with 8-bit and 16-bit Spansion > devices though. > > -Aaron Hi Aaron, I'm happy to test it, when you post the patch. Regards, Rogan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus 2011-03-24 16:59 ` Rogan Dawes @ 2011-03-26 6:32 ` Aaron Williams 2011-03-30 8:01 ` Rogan Dawes 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Aaron Williams @ 2011-03-26 6:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot I am still doing some testing and just added a fix today so that if a flash chip that supports both 8 and 16-bits is on an 8-bit bus the interface is set to 8-bits. I'll try and get patches out next week. So far it's working fairly well on all of our boards, most of which have an 8- bit bus but one has a 16-bit bus. I had to change all of the defined addresses for AMD parts and calculate the 16 and 32-bit addresses by applying a mask. The CFI code *should* work if there's an 8-bit part on a 16-bit bus, but it probably will not support two 8-bit parts in parallel. That should be doable with some work. -Aaron On Thursday, March 24, 2011 09:59:07 AM Rogan Dawes wrote: > On 2011/03/24 5:07 AM, Aaron Williams wrote: > > I have it working on our 8-bit boards properly now, though I've only done > > some limited testing. > > > > I basically put in the correct addresses into cfi_flash.h and updated > > various addresses for 8-bit support. The problem was that the CFI code > > was written using the 16-bit addresses which don't work for an 8-bit > > bus. > > > > I added a mask which is used to calculate the correct address for 16 and > > 32- bit busses. I have only been able to test with 8-bit and 16-bit > > Spansion devices though. > > > > -Aaron > > Hi Aaron, > > I'm happy to test it, when you post the patch. > > Regards, > > Rogan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus 2011-03-26 6:32 ` Aaron Williams @ 2011-03-30 8:01 ` Rogan Dawes 2011-03-30 11:14 ` Albert ARIBAUD 2011-04-02 6:27 ` Aaron Williams 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Rogan Dawes @ 2011-03-30 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 2011/03/26 8:32 AM, Aaron Williams wrote: > I am still doing some testing and just added a fix today so that if a flash > chip that supports both 8 and 16-bits is on an 8-bit bus the interface is set > to 8-bits. I'll try and get patches out next week. > > So far it's working fairly well on all of our boards, most of which have an 8- > bit bus but one has a 16-bit bus. I had to change all of the defined addresses > for AMD parts and calculate the 16 and 32-bit addresses by applying a mask. > > The CFI code *should* work if there's an 8-bit part on a 16-bit bus, but it > probably will not support two 8-bit parts in parallel. That should be doable > with some work. > > -Aaron Hi Aaron, I'm looking forward to seeing your patches. With any luck, they'll also work on my board, and a nasty hack can go away. :-) Regards, Rogan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus 2011-03-30 8:01 ` Rogan Dawes @ 2011-03-30 11:14 ` Albert ARIBAUD 2011-04-02 6:27 ` Aaron Williams 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Albert ARIBAUD @ 2011-03-30 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Le 30/03/2011 10:01, Rogan Dawes a ?crit : > On 2011/03/26 8:32 AM, Aaron Williams wrote: >> I am still doing some testing and just added a fix today so that if a flash >> chip that supports both 8 and 16-bits is on an 8-bit bus the interface is set >> to 8-bits. I'll try and get patches out next week. >> >> So far it's working fairly well on all of our boards, most of which have an 8- >> bit bus but one has a 16-bit bus. I had to change all of the defined addresses >> for AMD parts and calculate the 16 and 32-bit addresses by applying a mask. >> >> The CFI code *should* work if there's an 8-bit part on a 16-bit bus, but it >> probably will not support two 8-bit parts in parallel. That should be doable >> with some work. >> >> -Aaron > > Hi Aaron, > > I'm looking forward to seeing your patches. With any luck, they'll also > work on my board, and a nasty hack can go away. :-) I also would like to see these patches, even in RFC form. Maybe it could fix the way the MX29LV400CB is detected on ED Mini V2 and will allows removing legacy code for this board. > Regards, > > Rogan Amicalement, -- Albert. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus 2011-03-30 8:01 ` Rogan Dawes 2011-03-30 11:14 ` Albert ARIBAUD @ 2011-04-02 6:27 ` Aaron Williams 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Aaron Williams @ 2011-04-02 6:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot I'll post the patches as soon as I figure out how to get git to do it. The patches are fairly clean and works well for both an 8-bit bus and a 16-bit bus. My biggest obstical is that I'm not all that familiar with GIT and we use SVN internally. -Aaron On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 01:01:42 AM Rogan Dawes wrote: > On 2011/03/26 8:32 AM, Aaron Williams wrote: > > I am still doing some testing and just added a fix today so that if a > > flash chip that supports both 8 and 16-bits is on an 8-bit bus the > > interface is set to 8-bits. I'll try and get patches out next week. > > > > So far it's working fairly well on all of our boards, most of which have > > an 8- bit bus but one has a 16-bit bus. I had to change all of the > > defined addresses for AMD parts and calculate the 16 and 32-bit > > addresses by applying a mask. > > > > The CFI code *should* work if there's an 8-bit part on a 16-bit bus, but > > it probably will not support two 8-bit parts in parallel. That should be > > doable with some work. > > > > -Aaron > > Hi Aaron, > > I'm looking forward to seeing your patches. With any luck, they'll also > work on my board, and a nasty hack can go away. :-) > > Regards, > > Rogan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus @ 2018-04-19 15:17 Radovan Prodanovic 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Radovan Prodanovic @ 2018-04-19 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Has the pending patch for the issue described below ever been released? Am observing the same issue in the U-Boot version 2015-10. On 2011/03/18 6:02 AM, Aaron Williams wrote: > Hi, > > I am running into issues in that the CFI code is broken for flash with an 8- > bit bus. The problem is that the CFI code uses the wrong addresses for 8-bits > vs 16-bits. > > The CFI function flash_map incorrectly calculates the byte offset with > Spansion flash. > > In our case, we have an 8-bit Spansion S29GL-N MirrorBit flash chip on an 8- > bit bus. > > According to the data sheet, in 8-bit mode the first unlock address is 0xAAA > and the second is 0x555. Basically all of the addresses are approximately > double what they are in 16-bit mode. > > Most of the addresses in the CFI code are wrong for 8-bit mode. > > They should be as follows: > unlock1: 0xAAA > unlock2: 0x555 > CFI Query: 0xAA > > Offset Device ID: 0x02, 0x1c, 0x1e > Offset Silicon Sector Factory Protect: 0x6 > Sector protect verify (sector address) + 4 > > The problem is that the dectection code detects (incorrectly) that we're an 8- > bit device on a 16-bit bus when in fact it's an 8-bit bus. > > For 16-bits, it's: > > unlock1: 0x555 > unlock2: 0x2aa > CFI Query: 0x55 > Offset Device ID: 0x1, 0x0e, 0x0f > > Now, in 16-bit mode these addresses should be effectively doubled so they > should look to be the same to software as I understand it. > > This is all taken from the datasheet. > > Note that the CFI code works fine with the flash hooked up as 16-bit on a 16- > bit bus. > > If it's an 8-bit flash on a 16-bit bus then the addresses should be doubled. > > > -Aaron Thanks, Radovan Prodanovic S/W Designer, Embedded Platforms 613-691-3358 ________________________________ NOTE: This e-mail (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and/or protected by legal privilege. Any unauthorized review, use, copy, disclosure or distribution of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Mitel immediately and destroy all copies of this e-mail. Mitel does not accept any liability for breach of security, error or virus that may result from the transmission of this message. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-04-19 15:17 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-03-18 4:02 [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus Aaron Williams 2011-03-18 7:12 ` Rogan Dawes 2011-03-18 7:48 ` Aaron Williams 2011-03-24 3:07 ` Aaron Williams 2011-03-24 5:20 ` Stefan Roese 2011-03-24 16:59 ` Rogan Dawes 2011-03-26 6:32 ` Aaron Williams 2011-03-30 8:01 ` Rogan Dawes 2011-03-30 11:14 ` Albert ARIBAUD 2011-04-02 6:27 ` Aaron Williams -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2018-04-19 15:17 Radovan Prodanovic
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox