public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Barada <peter.barada@logicpd.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [Patch v2] Fix hash table deletion to prevent lost entries
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:05:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D87D9B0.1080102@logicpd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110321214823.EA538151A99@gemini.denx.de>

On 03/21/2011 05:48 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Peter Barada,
>
> In message <4D385A7F.2070803@logicpd.com> you wrote:
>> On 01/19/2011 03:47 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear Peter Barada,
>>>
>>> In message <4D371208.3090801@logicpd.com> you wrote:
>>>>>> The hash delete code is in error; instead of just removing the deleted
>>>>>> key, it should instead allocate a new hashtable, hash all the keys into
>>>>>> the new table except for the deleted key and then reclaim the old table
>>>>>> (and deleted key).
>>>>> Can you please come up with a patch?
>> From: Peter Barada <peter.barada@logicpd.com>
>> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:38:57 -0500
>> Subject: [PATCH] Fix hashtable to properly handle deletion.
>>
>> Use negative used value to mark deleted entry.  Search keeps probing past
>> deleted entries.  Adding an entry uses first deleted entry when it hits
>> end of probe chain.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Barada <peter.barada@logicpd.com>
> Checkpatch generates a number of errors:
>
> 	[PATCH] Fix hashtable to properly handle deletion.
> 	total: 8 errors, 16 warnings, 66 lines checked
>
> Can you please fix these, and resubmit?
Updated patch attached (Thunderbird munched tabs)...

> Also, do you happen to have a test case that can be used show the
> problem in the existing code, and to test the patch?
No, I don't have a testcase off hand (IIRC hashtable size is dependent on size of u-boot and amount of RAM), from my original email:

In message <4D34C85E.4030408@logicpd.com> you wrote:

> > 
> > After spending an entire day digging into the hash using GDB/BDI on my 
> > ARM board, I've findally figured out that the hash key of "ramdiskimage" 
> > and "preboot" are the same modulus 347, and this is problematic because 
> > on the initial hash import, preboot is placed into the hash first (at 
> > idx 190 since the table is sorted), and then ramdiskimage collides with 
> > preboot causing the 2nd probe (at idx 191) to occur which works fine.  
> > Unfortunately as part of the housecleaning, preboot is deleted and the 
> > environemnt saved.  The delete of preboot removes entry at idx 190 and 
> > the next lookup of ramdiskimage sees that idx 190 is empty and believes 
> > that the ramdiskimage is not in the table ionstead of rehashing to find 
> > it at idx 191.
Hope this helps...

-- 
Peter Barada
peter.barada at logicpd.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: u-boot-hashtable.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2901 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20110321/6df2f23f/attachment.bin 

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-21 23:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-17 22:53 [U-Boot] Hash problem Peter Barada
2011-01-19  8:32 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-19 16:32   ` [U-Boot] [Patch] Fix hash table deletion to prevent lost entries Peter Barada
2011-01-19 20:47     ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-20 15:53       ` [U-Boot] [Patch v2] " Peter Barada
2011-03-21 21:48         ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-03-21 23:05           ` Peter Barada [this message]
2011-03-22 21:45             ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D87D9B0.1080102@logicpd.com \
    --to=peter.barada@logicpd.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox