From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Schocher Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 07:14:02 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 00/23] keymile board update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D883E2A.6040301@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hello Prafulla, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de] >> On Behalf Of Heiko Schocher >> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 12:32 PM >> To: u-boot at lists.denx.de >> Cc: Heiko Schocher >> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 00/23] keymile board update >> >> The following patchset updates the support for the keymile >> boards. >> >> - fix a lot of Codingstyle issues for this boards >> - heavy rework of the headerfiles, common board code >> - add support for 4 new mpc83xx based boards >> - add support for 1 82xx based board >> - add support for 2 new kirkwood based boards >> - fix i2c deblocking for this boards > > Hi Heiko > Ideally this patch series should go all together, right? Yep. > Since there are multiple SoC based support in the same patch series, who is suppose to pull this? I think, that Wolfgang can pull this, if every custodian Acks the appropriate patches. > I suggest to have smaller patche series i.e. board wise. Yep, normally I aggree, but boards from this manufacturer use common headerfiles (we actually try to simplify), so this got such a big package ... sorry. > Since there is heavy rework, > Also take a look at mv-common.h that we have created for armada100 and Kirkwood common boards configs. With this we had an abstraction where mostly files are only added to any new board support. Ok, I look in it, maybe we can use them to simplify the config files for the kirkwood based boards. Thanks! bye, Heiko -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany