* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus
@ 2011-03-18 4:02 Aaron Williams
2011-03-18 7:12 ` Rogan Dawes
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Aaron Williams @ 2011-03-18 4:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi,
I am running into issues in that the CFI code is broken for flash with an 8-
bit bus. The problem is that the CFI code uses the wrong addresses for 8-bits
vs 16-bits.
The CFI function flash_map incorrectly calculates the byte offset with
Spansion flash.
In our case, we have an 8-bit Spansion S29GL-N MirrorBit flash chip on an 8-
bit bus.
According to the data sheet, in 8-bit mode the first unlock address is 0xAAA
and the second is 0x555. Basically all of the addresses are approximately
double what they are in 16-bit mode.
Most of the addresses in the CFI code are wrong for 8-bit mode.
They should be as follows:
unlock1: 0xAAA
unlock2: 0x555
CFI Query: 0xAA
Offset Device ID: 0x02, 0x1c, 0x1e
Offset Silicon Sector Factory Protect: 0x6
Sector protect verify (sector address) + 4
The problem is that the dectection code detects (incorrectly) that we're an 8-
bit device on a 16-bit bus when in fact it's an 8-bit bus.
For 16-bits, it's:
unlock1: 0x555
unlock2: 0x2aa
CFI Query: 0x55
Offset Device ID: 0x1, 0x0e, 0x0f
Now, in 16-bit mode these addresses should be effectively doubled so they
should look to be the same to software as I understand it.
This is all taken from the datasheet.
Note that the CFI code works fine with the flash hooked up as 16-bit on a 16-
bit bus.
If it's an 8-bit flash on a 16-bit bus then the addresses should be doubled.
flash detect cfi
fwc addr 1ec00000 cmd f0 f0 8bit x 8 bit
fwc addr 1ec00000 cmd ff ff 8bit x 8 bit
fwc addr 1ec00055 cmd 98 98 8bit x 8 bit <== should be 0x1ec000AA
is= cmd 51(Q) addr 1ec00010 is= 0 51
fwc addr 1ec00000 cmd f0 f0 8bit x 8 bit
fwc addr 1ec00000 cmd ff ff 8bit x 8 bit
fwc addr 1ec00555 cmd 98 98 8bit x 8 bit
is= cmd 51(Q) addr 1ec00010 is= 0 51
fwc addr 1ec00000 cmd f0 f0f0 16bit x 8 bit
fwc addr 1ec00000 cmd ff ffff 16bit x 8 bit
fwc addr 1ec000aa cmd 98 9898 16bit x 8 bit
is= cmd 51(Q) addr 1ec00020 is= 5151 5151
is= cmd 52(R) addr 1ec00022 is= 5252 5252
is= cmd 59(Y) addr 1ec00024 is= 5959 5959
device interface is 2
found port 2 chip 1 port 16 bits chip 8 bits
00 : 51 52 59 02 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 27 36 00 00 06 QRY..@.....'6...
10 : 06 09 13 03 05 03 02 18 02 00 06 00 01 7f 00 00 ................
20 : 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 13 e8 ................
fwc addr 1ec00000 cmd f0 f0f0 16bit x 8 bit
fwc addr 1ec01554 cmd aa aaaa 16bit x 8 bit
fwc addr 1ec00aaa cmd 55 5555 16bit x 8 bit
fwc addr 1ec01554 cmd 90 9090 16bit x 8 bit
fwc addr 1ec00000 cmd f0 f0f0 16bit x 8 bit
fwc addr 1ec000aa cmd 98 9898 16bit x 8 bit
manufacturer is 2
manufacturer id is 0x0
device id is 0x3f
device id2 is 0x0
cfi version is 0x3133
size_ratio 1 port 16 bits chip 8 bits
found 1 erase regions
erase region 0: 0x0200007f
erase_region_count = 128 erase_region_size = 131072
fwc addr 1ec00000 cmd f0 f0 8bit x 8 bit
fwc addr 1fbe0000 cmd 70 70 8bit x 8 bit
flash_is_busy: 0
Flash: 16 MiB
-Aaron
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus
2011-03-18 4:02 [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus Aaron Williams
@ 2011-03-18 7:12 ` Rogan Dawes
2011-03-18 7:48 ` Aaron Williams
2011-03-24 3:07 ` Aaron Williams
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rogan Dawes @ 2011-03-18 7:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 2011/03/18 6:02 AM, Aaron Williams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running into issues in that the CFI code is broken for flash with an 8-
> bit bus. The problem is that the CFI code uses the wrong addresses for 8-bits
> vs 16-bits.
>
> The CFI function flash_map incorrectly calculates the byte offset with
> Spansion flash.
>
> In our case, we have an 8-bit Spansion S29GL-N MirrorBit flash chip on an 8-
> bit bus.
>
> According to the data sheet, in 8-bit mode the first unlock address is 0xAAA
> and the second is 0x555. Basically all of the addresses are approximately
> double what they are in 16-bit mode.
>
> Most of the addresses in the CFI code are wrong for 8-bit mode.
>
> They should be as follows:
> unlock1: 0xAAA
> unlock2: 0x555
> CFI Query: 0xAA
>
> Offset Device ID: 0x02, 0x1c, 0x1e
> Offset Silicon Sector Factory Protect: 0x6
> Sector protect verify (sector address) + 4
>
> The problem is that the dectection code detects (incorrectly) that we're an 8-
> bit device on a 16-bit bus when in fact it's an 8-bit bus.
>
> For 16-bits, it's:
>
> unlock1: 0x555
> unlock2: 0x2aa
> CFI Query: 0x55
> Offset Device ID: 0x1, 0x0e, 0x0f
>
> Now, in 16-bit mode these addresses should be effectively doubled so they
> should look to be the same to software as I understand it.
>
> This is all taken from the datasheet.
>
> Note that the CFI code works fine with the flash hooked up as 16-bit on a 16-
> bit bus.
>
> If it's an 8-bit flash on a 16-bit bus then the addresses should be doubled.
>
>
> -Aaron
Hi Aaron,
Does this patch (originally by Stefan Roese) work for you? I also need
it for the DNS323 port. FWIW, mine is also a Spansion flash
(S29GL064M90TFIR4), although I am not 100% sure of the layout and
connectivity.
Rogan
---
drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c
index dd394a8..74e9ade 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c
@@ -291,6 +291,9 @@ static inline uchar flash_read_uchar (flash_info_t *
info, uint offset)
uchar *cp;
uchar retval;
+#if 1 // test-only
+ offset = offset * 2;
+#endif
cp = flash_map (info, 0, offset);
#if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN) || defined(CONFIG_SYS_WRITE_SWAPPED_DATA)
retval = flash_read8(cp);
@@ -308,6 +311,9 @@ static inline ushort flash_read_word (flash_info_t *
info, uint offset)
{
ushort *addr, retval;
+#if 1 // test-only
+ offset = offset * 2;
+#endif
addr = flash_map (info, 0, offset);
retval = flash_read16 (addr);
flash_unmap (info, 0, offset, addr);
@@ -328,6 +334,9 @@ static ulong flash_read_long (flash_info_t * info,
flash_sect_t sect,
#ifdef DEBUG
int x;
#endif
+#if 1 // test-only
+ offset = offset * 2;
+#endif
addr = flash_map (info, sect, offset);
#ifdef DEBUG
@@ -363,6 +372,9 @@ void flash_write_cmd (flash_info_t * info,
flash_sect_t sect,
void *addr;
cfiword_t cword;
+#if 1 // test-only
+ offset = offset * 2;
+#endif
addr = flash_map (info, sect, offset);
flash_make_cmd (info, cmd, &cword);
switch (info->portwidth) {
@@ -420,6 +432,9 @@ static int flash_isequal (flash_info_t * info,
flash_sect_t sect,
cfiword_t cword;
int retval;
+#if 1 // test-only
+ offset = offset * 2;
+#endif
addr = flash_map (info, sect, offset);
flash_make_cmd (info, cmd, &cword);
@@ -1762,6 +1777,7 @@ static int __flash_detect_cfi (flash_info_t *
info, struct cfi_qry *qry)
info->addr_unlock1 = 0x555;
info->addr_unlock2 = 0x2aa;
+#if 0 // test-only
/*
* modify the unlock address if we are
* in compatibility mode
@@ -1776,6 +1792,7 @@ static int __flash_detect_cfi (flash_info_t *
info, struct cfi_qry *qry)
info->addr_unlock1 = 0xaaa;
info->addr_unlock2 = 0x555;
}
+#endif
info->name = "CFI conformant";
return 1;
@@ -1942,11 +1959,13 @@ ulong flash_get_size (phys_addr_t base, int banknum)
debug ("cfi version is 0x%04x\n", info->cfi_version);
size_ratio = info->portwidth / info->chipwidth;
+#if 0 // test-only
/* if the chip is x8/x16 reduce the ratio by half */
if ((info->interface == FLASH_CFI_X8X16)
&& (info->chipwidth == FLASH_CFI_BY8)) {
size_ratio >>= 1;
}
+#endif
debug ("size_ratio %d port %d bits chip %d bits\n",
size_ratio, info->portwidth << CFI_FLASH_SHIFT_WIDTH,
info->chipwidth << CFI_FLASH_SHIFT_WIDTH);
@@ -2034,12 +2053,13 @@ ulong flash_get_size (phys_addr_t base, int banknum)
/* round up when converting to ms */
info->write_tout = (tmp + 999) / 1000;
info->flash_id = FLASH_MAN_CFI;
+#if 0
if ((info->interface == FLASH_CFI_X8X16) &&
(info->chipwidth == FLASH_CFI_BY8)) {
/* XXX - Need to test on x8/x16 in parallel. */
info->portwidth >>= 1;
}
-
+#endif
flash_write_cmd (info, 0, 0, info->cmd_reset);
}
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus
2011-03-18 7:12 ` Rogan Dawes
@ 2011-03-18 7:48 ` Aaron Williams
2011-03-24 3:07 ` Aaron Williams
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Aaron Williams @ 2011-03-18 7:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
I don't think that will work. Multiplying the offsets by two won't
always work (i.e. offset 2AA * 2 != 555). I think this will require a
more substantial fix. I started working on something but it may take me
a few days, though I have both an 8-bit and a 16-bit board to play with
(though no 8-bit chip on a 16-bit bus).
-Aaron
On 03/18/2011 12:12 AM, Rogan Dawes wrote:
> On 2011/03/18 6:02 AM, Aaron Williams wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am running into issues in that the CFI code is broken for flash with an 8-
>> bit bus. The problem is that the CFI code uses the wrong addresses for 8-bits
>> vs 16-bits.
>>
>> The CFI function flash_map incorrectly calculates the byte offset with
>> Spansion flash.
>>
>> In our case, we have an 8-bit Spansion S29GL-N MirrorBit flash chip on an 8-
>> bit bus.
>>
>> According to the data sheet, in 8-bit mode the first unlock address is 0xAAA
>> and the second is 0x555. Basically all of the addresses are approximately
>> double what they are in 16-bit mode.
>>
>> Most of the addresses in the CFI code are wrong for 8-bit mode.
>>
>> They should be as follows:
>> unlock1: 0xAAA
>> unlock2: 0x555
>> CFI Query: 0xAA
>>
>> Offset Device ID: 0x02, 0x1c, 0x1e
>> Offset Silicon Sector Factory Protect: 0x6
>> Sector protect verify (sector address) + 4
>>
>> The problem is that the dectection code detects (incorrectly) that we're an 8-
>> bit device on a 16-bit bus when in fact it's an 8-bit bus.
>>
>> For 16-bits, it's:
>>
>> unlock1: 0x555
>> unlock2: 0x2aa
>> CFI Query: 0x55
>> Offset Device ID: 0x1, 0x0e, 0x0f
>>
>> Now, in 16-bit mode these addresses should be effectively doubled so they
>> should look to be the same to software as I understand it.
>>
>> This is all taken from the datasheet.
>>
>> Note that the CFI code works fine with the flash hooked up as 16-bit on a 16-
>> bit bus.
>>
>> If it's an 8-bit flash on a 16-bit bus then the addresses should be doubled.
>>
>> -Aaron
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Does this patch (originally by Stefan Roese) work for you? I also need
> it for the DNS323 port. FWIW, mine is also a Spansion flash
> (S29GL064M90TFIR4), although I am not 100% sure of the layout and
> connectivity.
>
> Rogan
>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c
> index dd394a8..74e9ade 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c
> @@ -291,6 +291,9 @@ static inline uchar flash_read_uchar (flash_info_t *
> info, uint offset)
> uchar *cp;
> uchar retval;
>
> +#if 1 // test-only
> + offset = offset * 2;
> +#endif
> cp = flash_map (info, 0, offset);
> #if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN) || defined(CONFIG_SYS_WRITE_SWAPPED_DATA)
> retval = flash_read8(cp);
> @@ -308,6 +311,9 @@ static inline ushort flash_read_word (flash_info_t *
> info, uint offset)
> {
> ushort *addr, retval;
>
> +#if 1 // test-only
> + offset = offset * 2;
> +#endif
> addr = flash_map (info, 0, offset);
> retval = flash_read16 (addr);
> flash_unmap (info, 0, offset, addr);
> @@ -328,6 +334,9 @@ static ulong flash_read_long (flash_info_t * info,
> flash_sect_t sect,
> #ifdef DEBUG
> int x;
> #endif
> +#if 1 // test-only
> + offset = offset * 2;
> +#endif
> addr = flash_map (info, sect, offset);
>
> #ifdef DEBUG
> @@ -363,6 +372,9 @@ void flash_write_cmd (flash_info_t * info,
> flash_sect_t sect,
> void *addr;
> cfiword_t cword;
>
> +#if 1 // test-only
> + offset = offset * 2;
> +#endif
> addr = flash_map (info, sect, offset);
> flash_make_cmd (info, cmd, &cword);
> switch (info->portwidth) {
> @@ -420,6 +432,9 @@ static int flash_isequal (flash_info_t * info,
> flash_sect_t sect,
> cfiword_t cword;
> int retval;
>
> +#if 1 // test-only
> + offset = offset * 2;
> +#endif
> addr = flash_map (info, sect, offset);
> flash_make_cmd (info, cmd, &cword);
>
> @@ -1762,6 +1777,7 @@ static int __flash_detect_cfi (flash_info_t *
> info, struct cfi_qry *qry)
> info->addr_unlock1 = 0x555;
> info->addr_unlock2 = 0x2aa;
>
> +#if 0 // test-only
> /*
> * modify the unlock address if we are
> * in compatibility mode
> @@ -1776,6 +1792,7 @@ static int __flash_detect_cfi (flash_info_t *
> info, struct cfi_qry *qry)
> info->addr_unlock1 = 0xaaa;
> info->addr_unlock2 = 0x555;
> }
> +#endif
>
> info->name = "CFI conformant";
> return 1;
> @@ -1942,11 +1959,13 @@ ulong flash_get_size (phys_addr_t base, int banknum)
> debug ("cfi version is 0x%04x\n", info->cfi_version);
>
> size_ratio = info->portwidth / info->chipwidth;
> +#if 0 // test-only
> /* if the chip is x8/x16 reduce the ratio by half */
> if ((info->interface == FLASH_CFI_X8X16)
> && (info->chipwidth == FLASH_CFI_BY8)) {
> size_ratio >>= 1;
> }
> +#endif
> debug ("size_ratio %d port %d bits chip %d bits\n",
> size_ratio, info->portwidth << CFI_FLASH_SHIFT_WIDTH,
> info->chipwidth << CFI_FLASH_SHIFT_WIDTH);
> @@ -2034,12 +2053,13 @@ ulong flash_get_size (phys_addr_t base, int banknum)
> /* round up when converting to ms */
> info->write_tout = (tmp + 999) / 1000;
> info->flash_id = FLASH_MAN_CFI;
> +#if 0
> if ((info->interface == FLASH_CFI_X8X16) &&
> (info->chipwidth == FLASH_CFI_BY8)) {
> /* XXX - Need to test on x8/x16 in parallel. */
> info->portwidth >>= 1;
> }
> -
> +#endif
> flash_write_cmd (info, 0, 0, info->cmd_reset);
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus
2011-03-18 7:12 ` Rogan Dawes
2011-03-18 7:48 ` Aaron Williams
@ 2011-03-24 3:07 ` Aaron Williams
2011-03-24 5:20 ` Stefan Roese
2011-03-24 16:59 ` Rogan Dawes
1 sibling, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Aaron Williams @ 2011-03-24 3:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
I have it working on our 8-bit boards properly now, though I've only done some
limited testing.
I basically put in the correct addresses into cfi_flash.h and updated various
addresses for 8-bit support. The problem was that the CFI code was written
using the 16-bit addresses which don't work for an 8-bit bus.
I added a mask which is used to calculate the correct address for 16 and 32-
bit busses. I have only been able to test with 8-bit and 16-bit Spansion
devices though.
-Aaron
On Friday, March 18, 2011 12:12:22 AM Rogan Dawes wrote:
> On 2011/03/18 6:02 AM, Aaron Williams wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am running into issues in that the CFI code is broken for flash with an
> > 8- bit bus. The problem is that the CFI code uses the wrong addresses
> > for 8-bits vs 16-bits.
> >
> > The CFI function flash_map incorrectly calculates the byte offset with
> > Spansion flash.
> >
> > In our case, we have an 8-bit Spansion S29GL-N MirrorBit flash chip on an
> > 8- bit bus.
> >
> > According to the data sheet, in 8-bit mode the first unlock address is
> > 0xAAA and the second is 0x555. Basically all of the addresses are
> > approximately double what they are in 16-bit mode.
> >
> > Most of the addresses in the CFI code are wrong for 8-bit mode.
> >
> > They should be as follows:
> > unlock1: 0xAAA
> > unlock2: 0x555
> > CFI Query: 0xAA
> >
> > Offset Device ID: 0x02, 0x1c, 0x1e
> > Offset Silicon Sector Factory Protect: 0x6
> > Sector protect verify (sector address) + 4
> >
> > The problem is that the dectection code detects (incorrectly) that we're
> > an 8- bit device on a 16-bit bus when in fact it's an 8-bit bus.
> >
> > For 16-bits, it's:
> >
> > unlock1: 0x555
> > unlock2: 0x2aa
> > CFI Query: 0x55
> > Offset Device ID: 0x1, 0x0e, 0x0f
> >
> > Now, in 16-bit mode these addresses should be effectively doubled so they
> > should look to be the same to software as I understand it.
> >
> > This is all taken from the datasheet.
> >
> > Note that the CFI code works fine with the flash hooked up as 16-bit on a
> > 16- bit bus.
> >
> > If it's an 8-bit flash on a 16-bit bus then the addresses should be
> > doubled.
> >
> >
> >
> > -Aaron
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Does this patch (originally by Stefan Roese) work for you? I also need
> it for the DNS323 port. FWIW, mine is also a Spansion flash
> (S29GL064M90TFIR4), although I am not 100% sure of the layout and
> connectivity.
>
> Rogan
>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c
> index dd394a8..74e9ade 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c
> @@ -291,6 +291,9 @@ static inline uchar flash_read_uchar (flash_info_t *
> info, uint offset)
> uchar *cp;
> uchar retval;
>
> +#if 1 // test-only
> + offset = offset * 2;
> +#endif
> cp = flash_map (info, 0, offset);
> #if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN) || defined(CONFIG_SYS_WRITE_SWAPPED_DATA)
> retval = flash_read8(cp);
> @@ -308,6 +311,9 @@ static inline ushort flash_read_word (flash_info_t *
> info, uint offset)
> {
> ushort *addr, retval;
>
> +#if 1 // test-only
> + offset = offset * 2;
> +#endif
> addr = flash_map (info, 0, offset);
> retval = flash_read16 (addr);
> flash_unmap (info, 0, offset, addr);
> @@ -328,6 +334,9 @@ static ulong flash_read_long (flash_info_t * info,
> flash_sect_t sect,
> #ifdef DEBUG
> int x;
> #endif
> +#if 1 // test-only
> + offset = offset * 2;
> +#endif
> addr = flash_map (info, sect, offset);
>
> #ifdef DEBUG
> @@ -363,6 +372,9 @@ void flash_write_cmd (flash_info_t * info,
> flash_sect_t sect,
> void *addr;
> cfiword_t cword;
>
> +#if 1 // test-only
> + offset = offset * 2;
> +#endif
> addr = flash_map (info, sect, offset);
> flash_make_cmd (info, cmd, &cword);
> switch (info->portwidth) {
> @@ -420,6 +432,9 @@ static int flash_isequal (flash_info_t * info,
> flash_sect_t sect,
> cfiword_t cword;
> int retval;
>
> +#if 1 // test-only
> + offset = offset * 2;
> +#endif
> addr = flash_map (info, sect, offset);
> flash_make_cmd (info, cmd, &cword);
>
> @@ -1762,6 +1777,7 @@ static int __flash_detect_cfi (flash_info_t *
> info, struct cfi_qry *qry)
> info->addr_unlock1 = 0x555;
> info->addr_unlock2 = 0x2aa;
>
> +#if 0 // test-only
> /*
> * modify the unlock address if we are
> * in compatibility mode
> @@ -1776,6 +1792,7 @@ static int __flash_detect_cfi (flash_info_t *
> info, struct cfi_qry *qry)
> info->addr_unlock1 = 0xaaa;
> info->addr_unlock2 = 0x555;
> }
> +#endif
>
> info->name = "CFI conformant";
> return 1;
> @@ -1942,11 +1959,13 @@ ulong flash_get_size (phys_addr_t base, int
> banknum) debug ("cfi version is 0x%04x\n", info->cfi_version);
>
> size_ratio = info->portwidth / info->chipwidth;
> +#if 0 // test-only
> /* if the chip is x8/x16 reduce the ratio by half */
> if ((info->interface == FLASH_CFI_X8X16)
> && (info->chipwidth == FLASH_CFI_BY8)) {
> size_ratio >>= 1;
> }
> +#endif
> debug ("size_ratio %d port %d bits chip %d bits\n",
> size_ratio, info->portwidth << CFI_FLASH_SHIFT_WIDTH,
> info->chipwidth << CFI_FLASH_SHIFT_WIDTH);
> @@ -2034,12 +2053,13 @@ ulong flash_get_size (phys_addr_t base, int
> banknum) /* round up when converting to ms */
> info->write_tout = (tmp + 999) / 1000;
> info->flash_id = FLASH_MAN_CFI;
> +#if 0
> if ((info->interface == FLASH_CFI_X8X16) &&
> (info->chipwidth == FLASH_CFI_BY8)) {
> /* XXX - Need to test on x8/x16 in parallel. */
> info->portwidth >>= 1;
> }
> -
> +#endif
> flash_write_cmd (info, 0, 0, info->cmd_reset);
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus
2011-03-24 3:07 ` Aaron Williams
@ 2011-03-24 5:20 ` Stefan Roese
2011-03-24 16:59 ` Rogan Dawes
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roese @ 2011-03-24 5:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Aaron,
On Thursday 24 March 2011 04:07:21 Aaron Williams wrote:
> I have it working on our 8-bit boards properly now, though I've only done
> some limited testing.
Good.
> I basically put in the correct addresses into cfi_flash.h and updated
> various addresses for 8-bit support. The problem was that the CFI code was
> written using the 16-bit addresses which don't work for an 8-bit bus.
>
> I added a mask which is used to calculate the correct address for 16 and
> 32- bit busses. I have only been able to test with 8-bit and 16-bit
> Spansion devices though.
Please post the patch on the list. I'll try to test it on some of my systems
as well.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Stefan
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-0 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus
2011-03-24 3:07 ` Aaron Williams
2011-03-24 5:20 ` Stefan Roese
@ 2011-03-24 16:59 ` Rogan Dawes
2011-03-26 6:32 ` Aaron Williams
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rogan Dawes @ 2011-03-24 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 2011/03/24 5:07 AM, Aaron Williams wrote:
> I have it working on our 8-bit boards properly now, though I've only done some
> limited testing.
>
> I basically put in the correct addresses into cfi_flash.h and updated various
> addresses for 8-bit support. The problem was that the CFI code was written
> using the 16-bit addresses which don't work for an 8-bit bus.
>
> I added a mask which is used to calculate the correct address for 16 and 32-
> bit busses. I have only been able to test with 8-bit and 16-bit Spansion
> devices though.
>
> -Aaron
Hi Aaron,
I'm happy to test it, when you post the patch.
Regards,
Rogan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus
2011-03-24 16:59 ` Rogan Dawes
@ 2011-03-26 6:32 ` Aaron Williams
2011-03-30 8:01 ` Rogan Dawes
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Aaron Williams @ 2011-03-26 6:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
I am still doing some testing and just added a fix today so that if a flash
chip that supports both 8 and 16-bits is on an 8-bit bus the interface is set
to 8-bits. I'll try and get patches out next week.
So far it's working fairly well on all of our boards, most of which have an 8-
bit bus but one has a 16-bit bus. I had to change all of the defined addresses
for AMD parts and calculate the 16 and 32-bit addresses by applying a mask.
The CFI code *should* work if there's an 8-bit part on a 16-bit bus, but it
probably will not support two 8-bit parts in parallel. That should be doable
with some work.
-Aaron
On Thursday, March 24, 2011 09:59:07 AM Rogan Dawes wrote:
> On 2011/03/24 5:07 AM, Aaron Williams wrote:
> > I have it working on our 8-bit boards properly now, though I've only done
> > some limited testing.
> >
> > I basically put in the correct addresses into cfi_flash.h and updated
> > various addresses for 8-bit support. The problem was that the CFI code
> > was written using the 16-bit addresses which don't work for an 8-bit
> > bus.
> >
> > I added a mask which is used to calculate the correct address for 16 and
> > 32- bit busses. I have only been able to test with 8-bit and 16-bit
> > Spansion devices though.
> >
> > -Aaron
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
> I'm happy to test it, when you post the patch.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rogan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus
2011-03-26 6:32 ` Aaron Williams
@ 2011-03-30 8:01 ` Rogan Dawes
2011-03-30 11:14 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-04-02 6:27 ` Aaron Williams
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rogan Dawes @ 2011-03-30 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 2011/03/26 8:32 AM, Aaron Williams wrote:
> I am still doing some testing and just added a fix today so that if a flash
> chip that supports both 8 and 16-bits is on an 8-bit bus the interface is set
> to 8-bits. I'll try and get patches out next week.
>
> So far it's working fairly well on all of our boards, most of which have an 8-
> bit bus but one has a 16-bit bus. I had to change all of the defined addresses
> for AMD parts and calculate the 16 and 32-bit addresses by applying a mask.
>
> The CFI code *should* work if there's an 8-bit part on a 16-bit bus, but it
> probably will not support two 8-bit parts in parallel. That should be doable
> with some work.
>
> -Aaron
Hi Aaron,
I'm looking forward to seeing your patches. With any luck, they'll also
work on my board, and a nasty hack can go away. :-)
Regards,
Rogan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus
2011-03-30 8:01 ` Rogan Dawes
@ 2011-03-30 11:14 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-04-02 6:27 ` Aaron Williams
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Albert ARIBAUD @ 2011-03-30 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Le 30/03/2011 10:01, Rogan Dawes a ?crit :
> On 2011/03/26 8:32 AM, Aaron Williams wrote:
>> I am still doing some testing and just added a fix today so that if a flash
>> chip that supports both 8 and 16-bits is on an 8-bit bus the interface is set
>> to 8-bits. I'll try and get patches out next week.
>>
>> So far it's working fairly well on all of our boards, most of which have an 8-
>> bit bus but one has a 16-bit bus. I had to change all of the defined addresses
>> for AMD parts and calculate the 16 and 32-bit addresses by applying a mask.
>>
>> The CFI code *should* work if there's an 8-bit part on a 16-bit bus, but it
>> probably will not support two 8-bit parts in parallel. That should be doable
>> with some work.
>>
>> -Aaron
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
> I'm looking forward to seeing your patches. With any luck, they'll also
> work on my board, and a nasty hack can go away. :-)
I also would like to see these patches, even in RFC form. Maybe it could
fix the way the MX29LV400CB is detected on ED Mini V2 and will allows
removing legacy code for this board.
> Regards,
>
> Rogan
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus
2011-03-30 8:01 ` Rogan Dawes
2011-03-30 11:14 ` Albert ARIBAUD
@ 2011-04-02 6:27 ` Aaron Williams
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Aaron Williams @ 2011-04-02 6:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
I'll post the patches as soon as I figure out how to get git to do it.
The patches are fairly clean and works well for both an 8-bit bus and a 16-bit
bus.
My biggest obstical is that I'm not all that familiar with GIT and we use SVN
internally.
-Aaron
On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 01:01:42 AM Rogan Dawes wrote:
> On 2011/03/26 8:32 AM, Aaron Williams wrote:
> > I am still doing some testing and just added a fix today so that if a
> > flash chip that supports both 8 and 16-bits is on an 8-bit bus the
> > interface is set to 8-bits. I'll try and get patches out next week.
> >
> > So far it's working fairly well on all of our boards, most of which have
> > an 8- bit bus but one has a 16-bit bus. I had to change all of the
> > defined addresses for AMD parts and calculate the 16 and 32-bit
> > addresses by applying a mask.
> >
> > The CFI code *should* work if there's an 8-bit part on a 16-bit bus, but
> > it probably will not support two 8-bit parts in parallel. That should be
> > doable with some work.
> >
> > -Aaron
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
> I'm looking forward to seeing your patches. With any luck, they'll also
> work on my board, and a nasty hack can go away. :-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Rogan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus
@ 2018-04-19 15:17 Radovan Prodanovic
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Radovan Prodanovic @ 2018-04-19 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Has the pending patch for the issue described below ever been released?
Am observing the same issue in the U-Boot version 2015-10.
On 2011/03/18 6:02 AM, Aaron Williams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running into issues in that the CFI code is broken for flash with an 8-
> bit bus. The problem is that the CFI code uses the wrong addresses for 8-bits
> vs 16-bits.
>
> The CFI function flash_map incorrectly calculates the byte offset with
> Spansion flash.
>
> In our case, we have an 8-bit Spansion S29GL-N MirrorBit flash chip on an 8-
> bit bus.
>
> According to the data sheet, in 8-bit mode the first unlock address is 0xAAA
> and the second is 0x555. Basically all of the addresses are approximately
> double what they are in 16-bit mode.
>
> Most of the addresses in the CFI code are wrong for 8-bit mode.
>
> They should be as follows:
> unlock1: 0xAAA
> unlock2: 0x555
> CFI Query: 0xAA
>
> Offset Device ID: 0x02, 0x1c, 0x1e
> Offset Silicon Sector Factory Protect: 0x6
> Sector protect verify (sector address) + 4
>
> The problem is that the dectection code detects (incorrectly) that we're an 8-
> bit device on a 16-bit bus when in fact it's an 8-bit bus.
>
> For 16-bits, it's:
>
> unlock1: 0x555
> unlock2: 0x2aa
> CFI Query: 0x55
> Offset Device ID: 0x1, 0x0e, 0x0f
>
> Now, in 16-bit mode these addresses should be effectively doubled so they
> should look to be the same to software as I understand it.
>
> This is all taken from the datasheet.
>
> Note that the CFI code works fine with the flash hooked up as 16-bit on a 16-
> bit bus.
>
> If it's an 8-bit flash on a 16-bit bus then the addresses should be doubled.
>
>
> -Aaron
Thanks,
Radovan Prodanovic
S/W Designer, Embedded Platforms
613-691-3358
________________________________
NOTE: This e-mail (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and/or protected by legal privilege. Any unauthorized review, use, copy, disclosure or distribution of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Mitel immediately and destroy all copies of this e-mail. Mitel does not accept any liability for breach of security, error or virus that may result from the transmission of this message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-04-19 15:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-18 4:02 [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus Aaron Williams
2011-03-18 7:12 ` Rogan Dawes
2011-03-18 7:48 ` Aaron Williams
2011-03-24 3:07 ` Aaron Williams
2011-03-24 5:20 ` Stefan Roese
2011-03-24 16:59 ` Rogan Dawes
2011-03-26 6:32 ` Aaron Williams
2011-03-30 8:01 ` Rogan Dawes
2011-03-30 11:14 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-04-02 6:27 ` Aaron Williams
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-19 15:17 Radovan Prodanovic
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox