From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:34:25 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/5] Add Ethernet hardware MAC address
 framework to usbnet
In-Reply-To: <201104150425.37492.vapier@gentoo.org>
References: <1302655572-31544-1-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org>
	<201104150356.04503.vapier@gentoo.org>
	<4DA7FE17.8000105@aribaud.net>
	<201104150425.37492.vapier@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <4DA81121.2070606@aribaud.net>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Le 15/04/2011 10:25, Mike Frysinger a ?crit :
> On Friday, April 15, 2011 04:13:11 Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> What I disagree upon is that just because they're tools we should disregard
>> their warnings
>
> i never said any such thing
> -mike

My bad. What I disagree upon is that just because they're tools we 
should disregard *some of* their warnings.

More precisely, which checkpatch warnings must/should [not] be 
disregarded should not be a matter of personal choice but a coding style 
requirement.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.