From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBCaWXDn21hbm4=?= <biessmann@corscience.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:39:20 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/15] [REWORK AVR32/AT91] additional changes
	for avr32
In-Reply-To: <4DAC333C.8030603@emk-elektronik.de>
References: <1297266050-14449-1-git-send-email-biessmann@corscience.de>
	<4DAC333C.8030603@emk-elektronik.de>
Message-ID: <4DAC3F08.1050209@corscience.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Reinhard Meyer,

Am 18.04.2011 14:49, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
> Dear Andreas Bie?mann,

> Some of the patches did not apply. What did apply is now found in u-boot-atmel/next2.
> 
> I have no idea why they do not apply, since the AVR32 part has not changed since 110202.

I can check that and will rebase on u-boot-atmel/next.
BTW I personally dislike your inflationary creation of new branches. The
last days I could not understand why there are that much reworkXXX
branches for AT91 stuff. I hope only the one with latest timestamp is
worth to work with. Isn't that reworked stuff already in next branch? Or
are there some tasks not yet in next branch?

> Can you please rebase the series against next or resubmit the failed parts against next2?

I will rebase on u-boot-atmel/next, you can delete next2 branch, it
makes no sense to me.

best regards

Andreas Bie?mann