From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Reinhard Meyer Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:49:30 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/15] [REWORK AVR32/AT91] additional changes for avr32 In-Reply-To: <4DAC3F08.1050209@corscience.de> References: <1297266050-14449-1-git-send-email-biessmann@corscience.de> <4DAC333C.8030603@emk-elektronik.de> <4DAC3F08.1050209@corscience.de> Message-ID: <4DADAF0A.8060904@emk-elektronik.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Andreas Bie?mann, >> Some of the patches did not apply. What did apply is now found in u-boot-atmel/next2. >> >> I have no idea why they do not apply, since the AVR32 part has not changed since 110202. > > I can check that and will rebase on u-boot-atmel/next. Applied to u-boot-atmel/next. > BTW I personally dislike your inflationary creation of new branches. The > last days I could not understand why there are that much reworkXXX > branches for AT91 stuff. Those have a date which reflect the u-boot-arm/master they were rebased onto. I rather only remove them if and when all patches have been pulled into u-boot-arm (just in case). > I hope only the one with latest timestamp is > worth to work with. Isn't that reworked stuff already in next branch? Or > are there some tasks not yet in next branch? Not all is in next, all changes I did to at9sam9260/9XE/9G20-ek and out own board (TOP9000) are not yet in next, I had problems rebasing them to current u-boot-arm/master and not enough time yet to fix that. > I will rebase on u-boot-atmel/next, you can delete next2 branch, it > makes no sense to me. next2 is always temporary until next is moved to next2. Best Regards, Reinhard