From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Reinhard Meyer Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:36:37 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/15] [REWORK AVR32/AT91] additional changes for avr32 In-Reply-To: <7AD13591-19D9-4A6A-BD6F-2B2959F96DE9@googlemail.com> References: <1297266050-14449-1-git-send-email-biessmann@corscience.de> <4DAC333C.8030603@emk-elektronik.de> <4DAC3F08.1050209@corscience.de> <4DADAF0A.8060904@emk-elektronik.de> <7AD13591-19D9-4A6A-BD6F-2B2959F96DE9@googlemail.com> Message-ID: <4DADE445.4060105@emk-elektronik.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Andreas Bie?mann, > Am 19.04.2011 um 17:49 schrieb Reinhard Meyer: > >> Dear Andreas Bie?mann, >>>> Some of the patches did not apply. What did apply is now found in u-boot-atmel/next2. >>>> >>>> I have no idea why they do not apply, since the AVR32 part has not changed since 110202. >>> >>> I can check that and will rebase on u-boot-atmel/next. >> >> Applied to u-boot-atmel/next. >> >>> BTW I personally dislike your inflationary creation of new branches. The >>> last days I could not understand why there are that much reworkXXX >>> branches for AT91 stuff. >> >> Those have a date which reflect the u-boot-arm/master they were rebased onto. I rather only >> remove them if and when all patches have been pulled into u-boot-arm (just in case). > > Ok, but changes to origin/master from 20101209 in rework101209 are not included in rework101217? This would not make sense to me. I said nothing like that. > >>> I hope only the one with latest timestamp is >>> worth to work with. Isn't that reworked stuff already in next branch? Or >>> are there some tasks not yet in next branch? >> >> Not all is in next, all changes I did to at9sam9260/9XE/9G20-ek and out own board (TOP9000) >> are not yet in next, I had problems rebasing them to current u-boot-arm/master and not enough >> time yet to fix that. > > Ok, I've got an at91sam9260ek here and like to get it working with current mainline (plus the reworking stuff for at91 devices). Which branch should I take? Which changes are worth to look at for 2011.06 regarding sam9260 devices or is it too late for that? Top 2 patches in rework110202 should do the trick, once they are made to apply to current next. best regards Reinhard