[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/6] TFTP: rename "server" to "remote"

[Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@comelit.it>]

Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
>> Il 19/04/2011 16:18, Detlev Zundel ha scritto:
>>> Hi Luca,
>>>
>>>> With the upcoming TFTP server implementation, the remote node can be
>>>> either a client or a server, so avoid ambiguities.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli<luca.ceresoli@comelit.it>
>>>> Cc: Wolfgang Denk<wd@denx.de>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>    - fixed checkpatch issues.
>>>>
>>>>    net/tftp.c |   42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>>>    1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/tftp.c b/net/tftp.c
>>>> index 00abec3..da545c6 100644
>>>> --- a/net/tftp.c
>>>> +++ b/net/tftp.c
>>>> @@ -55,18 +55,18 @@ enum {
>>>>    	TFTP_ERR_FILE_ALREADY_EXISTS = 6,
>>>>    };
>>>>
>>>> -static IPaddr_t TftpServerIP;
>>>> -static int	TftpServerPort;		/* The UDP port at their end		*/
>>>> -static int	TftpOurPort;		/* The UDP port at our end		*/
>>>> +static IPaddr_t TftpRemoteIP;
>>>> +static int	TftpRemotePort;	/* The UDP port at their end		*/
>>>> +static int	TftpOurPort;	/* The UDP port at our end		*/
>>>>    static int	TftpTimeoutCount;
>>>> -static ulong	TftpBlock;		/* packet sequence number		*/
>>>> -static ulong	TftpLastBlock;		/* last packet sequence number received */
>>>> -static ulong	TftpBlockWrap;		/* count of sequence number wraparounds */
>>>> -static ulong	TftpBlockWrapOffset;	/* memory offset due to wrapping	*/
>>>> +static ulong	TftpBlock;	/* packet sequence number		*/
>>>> +static ulong	TftpLastBlock;	/* last packet sequence number received */
>>>> +static ulong	TftpBlockWrap;	/* count of sequence number wraparounds */
>>>> +static ulong	TftpBlockWrapOffset; /* memory offset due to wrapping	*/
>>> These changes are indentation only changes, so they should be in a
>>> separate patch.
>> It's needed for checkpatch compliance.
> I'm trying to understand the problems involved, but looking at this
> again, it is not clear to me what you say here.  When I run your version
> 1 of the patches (where you only do the rename) through checkpatch, I
> get:
>
>    WARNING: line over 80 characters
>    #116: FILE: net/tftp.c:59:
>    +static int	TftpRemotePort;		/* The UDP port at their end		*/
>
>    WARNING: consider using kstrto* in preference to simple_strtol
>    #215: FILE: net/tftp.c:619:
>    +		TftpRemotePort = simple_strtol(ep, NULL, 10);
>
>    total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 99 lines checked
>
>    /home/dzu/transfer/p2 has style problems, please review.  If any of these errors
>    are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
>    CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
>
> So I'm not sure why you say that the other changes are needed for
> checkpatch.  What exactly do you mean by this?

All the comments were nicely columned before my patchset. Reducing the
length of a line would have broken this.

I chose to change all of them in order to preserve the pre-existing 
coding style.

Luca