* [U-Boot] [PATCH] MX53: Handle silicon revision 2.1 case
@ 2011-04-26 0:46 Fabio Estevam
2011-04-26 8:37 ` Stefano Babic
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2011-04-26 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/soc.c | 3 +++
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/soc.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/soc.c
index 6f4e8db..fa7ee6d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/soc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/soc.c
@@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ u32 get_cpu_rev(void)
case 0x20:
system_rev |= CHIP_REV_2_0;
break;
+ case 0x21:
+ system_rev |= CHIP_REV_2_1;
+ break;
default:
system_rev |= CHIP_REV_1_0;
break;
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h
index a1849f8..2d3d501 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h
@@ -175,6 +175,7 @@
#define CHIP_REV_1_0 0x10
#define CHIP_REV_1_1 0x11
#define CHIP_REV_2_0 0x20
+#define CHIP_REV_2_1 0x21
#define CHIP_REV_2_5 0x25
#define CHIP_REV_3_0 0x30
--
1.6.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] MX53: Handle silicon revision 2.1 case
2011-04-26 0:46 [U-Boot] [PATCH] MX53: Handle silicon revision 2.1 case Fabio Estevam
@ 2011-04-26 8:37 ` Stefano Babic
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Babic @ 2011-04-26 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 04/26/2011 02:46 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/soc.c | 3 +++
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
Hi Fabio,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/soc.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/soc.c
> index 6f4e8db..fa7ee6d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/soc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/soc.c
> @@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ u32 get_cpu_rev(void)
> case 0x20:
> system_rev |= CHIP_REV_2_0;
> break;
> + case 0x21:
> + system_rev |= CHIP_REV_2_1;
> + break;
At the moment it seems to me that the revision number corresponds 1:1 to
the value of the register in the i.MX53, and we do not need some mapping
as for i.MX51. What about to drop the switch and adding a simpler:
if (reg < 0x20)
system_rev |= CHIP_REV_1_0;
else
system_rev |= reg;
Best regards,
Stefano
--
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office@denx.de
=====================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-26 8:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-26 0:46 [U-Boot] [PATCH] MX53: Handle silicon revision 2.1 case Fabio Estevam
2011-04-26 8:37 ` Stefano Babic
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox