public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MX31: change return value of get_cpu_rev
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:14:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DBAAB9C.7030604@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2pqo55lwp.fsf@ohwell.denx.de>

On 04/29/2011 01:36 PM, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
> 
>> Drop warnings in get_cpu_rev and changes the return value
>> (a u32 instead of char * is returned) of the function
>> to be coherent with other processors.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
>> CC: Detlev Zundev <dzu@denx.de>
> 
> Can you please correct the spelling of my name?  Thanks.

Sorry, I should know how to write your name...


>> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ char *get_cpu_rev(void)
>>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mx31_cpu_type); i++)
>>  		if (srev == mx31_cpu_type[i].srev)
>>  			return mx31_cpu_type[i].v;
>> -		return "unknown";
>> +	return srev;
> 
> Hm, so we drop the "unknown" case and return the srev unchanged.

Yes, I have changed this behavior. I thought, if the revision is not in
the table, it is better to know which is the value of srev register. I
do not know if it is better to print only an "unknown" or get directly
the value of the register, to check in some documentation which new
version was put on the board.

> And here we have no way of knowing if the output number is the result of
> a correct translation or if our table is insufficient.  This is not
> good.
> 
> Please provide a "unknown" case again for missing table entries.

Understood. I will change the behavior as set previously.

Best regards,
Stefano Babic

-- 
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-29 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-29  7:13 [U-Boot] [PATCH] MX31: change return value of get_cpu_rev Stefano Babic
2011-04-29 11:36 ` Detlev Zundel
2011-04-29 12:14   ` Stefano Babic [this message]
2011-04-29 12:54     ` Detlev Zundel
2011-04-29 14:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] " Stefano Babic
2011-04-29 15:22   ` Detlev Zundel
2011-05-01 16:38 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] " Stefano Babic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DBAAB9C.7030604@denx.de \
    --to=sbabic@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox