From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aneesh V <aneesh@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 12:29:36 +0530
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 08/22] omap: add spl support
In-Reply-To: <20110516154350.F16DB1491B07@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1298893591-17636-1-git-send-email-aneesh@ti.com>
	<1305472900-4004-9-git-send-email-aneesh@ti.com>
	<20110515195208.EA0971491B06@gemini.denx.de>
	<4DD13056.3000509@ti.com>
	<20110516154350.F16DB1491B07@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <4DD21CD8.2080409@ti.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Wolfgang,

On Monday 16 May 2011 09:13 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Aneesh V,
>
> In message<4DD13056.3000509@ti.com>  you wrote:
>>
>>> Again, this appears to be not the right order.
>>>
>>> I think, in the first step of this series, we should move the existing
>>> code from nand_spl and onenand_ipl into something like spl/nand and
>>> spl/onenand, respectivly, and make sure all teh existing systems still
>>> build.  The we can add more such support.
>>
>> IMHO, we should just have spl/board/<vendor>/<board>/ .
>>
>> Let spl/board/<vendor>/<board>/Makefile decide what it wants to
>> build.
>
> There are common, board independent parts both in spl/nand and
> spl/onenand.
>

How about having them at the root level in 'spl/' ?

best regards,
Aneesh