From: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] Review of U-Boot timer API
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 07:31:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDB42B1.2010206@emk-elektronik.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=ayrqMGzjT-EvU3Hq3ZJbo=_8oOw@mail.gmail.com>
I know its futile to repeat what I suggested about 9 months ago...
Since get_timer() is only used (to my knowledge) to break out of
loops that do not terminate normally because an expected event does
not occur, the following API would be simpler and take less time per
loop:
(I use the names A and B to avoid nitpicking on real function names
which can be later chosen arbitrarily if this idea prevails...)
uint timeout = A(timeout_in_ms);
do {...} while (!B(timeout));
OR
for (;;) {
dowhatever...
if (B(timeout)) {
error_handling...
break;
}
}
Internally both functions would be rather trival:
uint A(uint timeout_in_ms):
return current_tick + timeout_in_ms * ticks_per_ms;
or - for better precision if ticks_per_ms is not a whole number:
return current_tick + (timeout_in_ms * ticks_per_second) / 1000;
or any fractional method to more exactly calculate that equation
without needing a 64 bit divide.
bool B(uint end_tick):
a simple unsigned subtraction of end_tick minus current_tick,
evaluating the carry flag. Since we don't get a carry flag in C
a simple methods will do:
return ((int)(end_tick - current_tick)) < 0;
options:
current_tick needs only to be uint32, to get to the largest possible timeout
any 64 bit tick counter can be right shifted to get a 32 bit value that
increments just faster than 1ms.
features:
the only complicated calculation is done before the loop starts, the loop
itself is not made significantly slower since only a subtraction (and maybe
shift to scale down a high speed tick) is required.
Reinhard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-24 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 101+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-21 12:38 [U-Boot] [RFC] Review of U-Boot timer API Graeme Russ
[not found] ` <4DD7DB64.70605@comcast.net>
2011-05-22 0:06 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-22 0:43 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-22 4:26 ` Reinhard Meyer
2011-05-22 6:23 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-22 7:21 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-22 7:44 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-22 8:15 ` Reinhard Meyer
2011-05-23 0:02 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-23 0:20 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-23 0:14 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-23 1:00 ` Graeme Russ
[not found] ` <4DD9B608.7080307@comcast.net>
2011-05-23 1:42 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-23 5:02 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-23 5:25 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-23 6:29 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-05-23 10:53 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-23 16:22 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-23 12:09 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-23 12:29 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-23 13:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-23 17:30 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-23 18:24 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-05-23 19:18 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-23 18:27 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-23 19:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-23 20:26 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-23 21:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-23 20:48 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-23 3:26 ` Reinhard Meyer
2011-05-23 5:20 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-22 6:57 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-23 12:13 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-24 3:42 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-24 4:07 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-24 4:24 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-24 4:35 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-24 5:31 ` Reinhard Meyer [this message]
2011-05-24 5:43 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-24 6:11 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-05-24 7:10 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-24 14:15 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-24 14:12 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-24 15:23 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-24 19:09 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-24 13:29 ` Scott McNutt
2011-05-24 14:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-24 16:51 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-24 18:59 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-24 19:31 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-24 19:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-24 22:32 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-25 5:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-25 16:50 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-25 19:56 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-25 0:17 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-25 2:53 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-25 3:21 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-25 5:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-25 6:06 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-25 8:08 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-25 8:38 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-25 11:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-25 11:52 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-25 12:26 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-25 12:42 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-25 12:59 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-25 13:14 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-25 13:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-25 21:11 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-25 21:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-25 23:13 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-26 0:15 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-26 0:33 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-26 4:19 ` Reinhard Meyer
2011-05-26 4:40 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-26 5:03 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-26 5:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-26 5:25 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-26 5:55 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-05-26 6:18 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-26 6:36 ` Reinhard Meyer
2011-05-26 8:48 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-26 9:02 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-26 4:54 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-25 5:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-25 6:02 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-25 8:06 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-25 8:26 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-25 11:32 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-25 11:53 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-25 12:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-25 12:36 ` Scott McNutt
2011-05-25 12:43 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-25 13:08 ` Scott McNutt
2011-05-25 13:16 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-25 13:46 ` Scott McNutt
2011-05-25 14:21 ` Graeme Russ
2011-05-25 19:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-05-25 20:40 ` J. William Campbell
2011-05-25 20:48 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DDB42B1.2010206@emk-elektronik.de \
--to=u-boot@emk-elektronik.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox