[U-Boot] arm: at91: ether: cleanup MAC setting

[U-Boot] arm: at91: ether: cleanup MAC setting

[Igor Grinberg]

Hi Reinhard,


What about this [1] patch?

Are there any issues with it? Will you take it?


[1] - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/93639/


-- 
Regards,
Igor.

[U-Boot] arm: at91: ether: cleanup MAC setting

[Andreas Bießmann]

Dear Igor Grinberg,

Am 07.06.2011 08:09, schrieb Igor Grinberg:
> Hi Reinhard,
> 
> 
> What about this [1] patch?
> 
> Are there any issues with it? Will you take it?

the arch/arm/arm920t/at91rm9200 is subject to be deleted soon!
If you have any device that require this patch then please change that
device to use arch/arm/arm920t/at91 immediately. You may have a look for
at91rm9200ek or eb_cpux9k2 boards to see how this works.

> [1] - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/93639/

regards

Andreas Bie?mann

[U-Boot] arm: at91: ether: cleanup MAC setting

[Igor Grinberg]

On 06/07/11 10:37, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:

> Dear Igor Grinberg,
>
> Am 07.06.2011 08:09, schrieb Igor Grinberg:
>> Hi Reinhard,
>>
>>
>> What about this [1] patch?
>>
>> Are there any issues with it? Will you take it?
> the arch/arm/arm920t/at91rm9200 is subject to be deleted soon!
> If you have any device that require this patch then please change that
> device to use arch/arm/arm920t/at91 immediately. You may have a look for
> at91rm9200ek or eb_cpux9k2 boards to see how this works.

Finally, I get some answer... Thanks!
No I don't have the hardware.
This patch was a part of something else, we tried to achieve (get rid of machine_is..).
If you say, it will be removed completely, then don't bother about this patch,
go ahead and kill it.



-- 
Regards,
Igor.

[U-Boot] arm: at91: ether: cleanup MAC setting

[Reinhard Meyer]

Dear Igor Grinberg,
> On 06/07/11 10:37, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
> 
>> Dear Igor Grinberg,
>>
>> Am 07.06.2011 08:09, schrieb Igor Grinberg:
>>> Hi Reinhard,
>>>
>>>
>>> What about this [1] patch?
>>>
>>> Are there any issues with it? Will you take it?
>> the arch/arm/arm920t/at91rm9200 is subject to be deleted soon!
>> If you have any device that require this patch then please change that
>> device to use arch/arm/arm920t/at91 immediately. You may have a look for
>> at91rm9200ek or eb_cpux9k2 boards to see how this works.
> 
> Finally, I get some answer... Thanks!
> No I don't have the hardware.
> This patch was a part of something else, we tried to achieve (get rid of machine_is..).
> If you say, it will be removed completely, then don't bother about this patch,
> go ahead and kill it.
Actually I had planned to apply it, but if that makes no sense any more,
we can skip the effort.

For the "cleanup/rework" of RM9200 I have to rely on Andreas ;)

Best Regards,

Reinhard

[U-Boot] arm: at91: ether: cleanup MAC setting

[Jens Scharsig]

> Hi Reinhard,
> 
> 
> What about this [1] patch?
> 
> Are there any issues with it? Will you take it?
> 
> 
> [1] - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/93639/
> 
> 
Dear Igor Grinberg,

please read doc/README.at91-soc. The goal of atmel rework is join all
trees to reduce duplicate code. So, do not change anything in
arm920t/at91rm9200. Please convert your board to use arm920t/at91 soc.

See at91rm9200ek or eb_cpux9k2 for an example.

Best regards

Jens Scharsig