* [U-Boot] arm: at91: ether: cleanup MAC setting
@ 2011-06-07 6:09 Igor Grinberg
2011-06-07 7:37 ` Andreas Bießmann
2011-06-07 7:39 ` Jens Scharsig
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Igor Grinberg @ 2011-06-07 6:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Reinhard,
What about this [1] patch?
Are there any issues with it? Will you take it?
[1] - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/93639/
--
Regards,
Igor.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] arm: at91: ether: cleanup MAC setting
2011-06-07 6:09 [U-Boot] arm: at91: ether: cleanup MAC setting Igor Grinberg
@ 2011-06-07 7:37 ` Andreas Bießmann
2011-06-07 7:55 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-06-07 7:39 ` Jens Scharsig
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Bießmann @ 2011-06-07 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Igor Grinberg,
Am 07.06.2011 08:09, schrieb Igor Grinberg:
> Hi Reinhard,
>
>
> What about this [1] patch?
>
> Are there any issues with it? Will you take it?
the arch/arm/arm920t/at91rm9200 is subject to be deleted soon!
If you have any device that require this patch then please change that
device to use arch/arm/arm920t/at91 immediately. You may have a look for
at91rm9200ek or eb_cpux9k2 boards to see how this works.
> [1] - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/93639/
regards
Andreas Bie?mann
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] arm: at91: ether: cleanup MAC setting
2011-06-07 6:09 [U-Boot] arm: at91: ether: cleanup MAC setting Igor Grinberg
2011-06-07 7:37 ` Andreas Bießmann
@ 2011-06-07 7:39 ` Jens Scharsig
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jens Scharsig @ 2011-06-07 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
> Hi Reinhard,
>
>
> What about this [1] patch?
>
> Are there any issues with it? Will you take it?
>
>
> [1] - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/93639/
>
>
Dear Igor Grinberg,
please read doc/README.at91-soc. The goal of atmel rework is join all
trees to reduce duplicate code. So, do not change anything in
arm920t/at91rm9200. Please convert your board to use arm920t/at91 soc.
See at91rm9200ek or eb_cpux9k2 for an example.
Best regards
Jens Scharsig
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] arm: at91: ether: cleanup MAC setting
2011-06-07 7:37 ` Andreas Bießmann
@ 2011-06-07 7:55 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-06-07 8:10 ` Reinhard Meyer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Igor Grinberg @ 2011-06-07 7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 06/07/11 10:37, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
> Dear Igor Grinberg,
>
> Am 07.06.2011 08:09, schrieb Igor Grinberg:
>> Hi Reinhard,
>>
>>
>> What about this [1] patch?
>>
>> Are there any issues with it? Will you take it?
> the arch/arm/arm920t/at91rm9200 is subject to be deleted soon!
> If you have any device that require this patch then please change that
> device to use arch/arm/arm920t/at91 immediately. You may have a look for
> at91rm9200ek or eb_cpux9k2 boards to see how this works.
Finally, I get some answer... Thanks!
No I don't have the hardware.
This patch was a part of something else, we tried to achieve (get rid of machine_is..).
If you say, it will be removed completely, then don't bother about this patch,
go ahead and kill it.
--
Regards,
Igor.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] arm: at91: ether: cleanup MAC setting
2011-06-07 7:55 ` Igor Grinberg
@ 2011-06-07 8:10 ` Reinhard Meyer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Reinhard Meyer @ 2011-06-07 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Igor Grinberg,
> On 06/07/11 10:37, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
>
>> Dear Igor Grinberg,
>>
>> Am 07.06.2011 08:09, schrieb Igor Grinberg:
>>> Hi Reinhard,
>>>
>>>
>>> What about this [1] patch?
>>>
>>> Are there any issues with it? Will you take it?
>> the arch/arm/arm920t/at91rm9200 is subject to be deleted soon!
>> If you have any device that require this patch then please change that
>> device to use arch/arm/arm920t/at91 immediately. You may have a look for
>> at91rm9200ek or eb_cpux9k2 boards to see how this works.
>
> Finally, I get some answer... Thanks!
> No I don't have the hardware.
> This patch was a part of something else, we tried to achieve (get rid of machine_is..).
> If you say, it will be removed completely, then don't bother about this patch,
> go ahead and kill it.
Actually I had planned to apply it, but if that makes no sense any more,
we can skip the effort.
For the "cleanup/rework" of RM9200 I have to rely on Andreas ;)
Best Regards,
Reinhard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-07 8:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-07 6:09 [U-Boot] arm: at91: ether: cleanup MAC setting Igor Grinberg
2011-06-07 7:37 ` Andreas Bießmann
2011-06-07 7:55 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-06-07 8:10 ` Reinhard Meyer
2011-06-07 7:39 ` Jens Scharsig
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox