From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Bie=DFmann?= Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:03:19 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] Atmel pull request? In-Reply-To: <4DF0727E.7010209@eukrea.com> References: <20110609070631.415211B993A8@gemini.denx.de> <4DF0727E.7010209@eukrea.com> Message-ID: <4DF08C57.8080901@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Eric B?nard, Am 09.06.2011 09:13, schrieb Eric B?nard: > Hi, > > On 09/06/2011 09:06, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> what are the chances to see a pull request for the Atmel boards any >> time soon? As is, theyu still form the majority of broken ARM boards, >> and I would like to get the release out as soon as possible. >> >> So I'd appreciate if we could have your pull request ASAP, then I >> could make a -rc3 and allow for a few days of testing, before >> releasing v2011.06. >> > And the clock update for AT91RM9200 : > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99344/ > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99550/ These are not really required. These two are the first steps to get atmel_usart working (I've got it now since yesterday evening on my at91rm9200ek!). After another patch (replace at91rm9200_usart by atmel_usart) we can remove at91rm9200_usart. The next step would be to remove the whole a/a/c/arm920t/at91rm9200 directory and complete the transition to at91 for at91rm9200 devices as described in README.at91-soc. But I do not want to get these changes in precipitately. I'm fine with an integration for 2011.09. @Wolfgang: Deletion of defective ARM boards will start after 2011.06 release. Is that correct? regards Andreas Bie?mann