From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:00:31 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91 rework: pm9261, pm9263 and pm9g45
In-Reply-To: <4DF0A71E.7020100@emk-elektronik.de>
References: <4DF08968.4080501@ronetix.at> <4DF0A71E.7020100@emk-elektronik.de>
Message-ID: <4DF0A7CF.9010907@emk-elektronik.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Am 09.06.2011 12:57, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
> Dear Asen Dimov,
>> Hello,
>>
>> I got several instances of the patches, probably you got it too,
>> so I apology for the mess.
> 
> Actually, I did get none per e-Mail, I see them in patchworks only.
> 
>>
>> Here is the list of patches:
>>
>> [PM9261]
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99663/
> 
> The empty reset_timer() function added there can obviously only
> solve build issues.
> On any account reset_timer() must not be used anymore.
> As such this patch must get a NAK.
> 
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99665/
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99666/
>>
>> [PM9263]
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99662/
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99668/
>>
>> [PM9G45]
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99664/
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99667/

Ah, and patches should be numbered 1/n .. n/n; 0/n is only
for a descriptive summary.

Best Regards,
Reinhard