From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: RONETIX - Asen Dimov <dimov@ronetix.at>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:17:04 +0300
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91 rework: pm9261, pm9263 and pm9g45
In-Reply-To: <4DF0A71E.7020100@emk-elektronik.de>
References: <4DF08968.4080501@ronetix.at> <4DF0A71E.7020100@emk-elektronik.de>
Message-ID: <4DF0B9C0.2020001@ronetix.at>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hello Reinhard,

On 06/09/2011 01:57 PM, Reinhard Meyer wrote:
...
> Dear Asen Dimov,
> The empty reset_timer() function added there can obviously only
> solve build issues.
> On any account reset_timer() must not be used anymore.
> As such this patch must get a NAK.
>
The architectures, except AT91 are using reset_timer() to make epochs
(start from zero). I don't want to break the other architectures
and I need the CFI driver for pm92613 and pm9261. I can not think of
another idea, except an empty reset_timer(). Any suggestions, ideas?
...
> Best Regards,
> Reinhard
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Regards,
Asen