From: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] ARM/ATMEL/AT91: rework SoCs 9261/9263 and others
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:58:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF79338.3020908@emk-elektronik.de> (raw)
Dear Friends,
I have received several different patches reworking
"at91sam*_devices.c"
and
"at91sam9*.h".
Lokking at them, none of them is completely done the way the files for
at91sam9260 are done.
Examples:
9260, 9263: ATMEL_ID_USART0
9261: ATMEL_ID_US0
9260 uses the CONFIG_AT91_GPIO_PULLUP define, the others do not.
9261 still uses the CONFIG_USARTx defines.
Please have a look at at91sam9260 as a reference.
We do need a properly fixed SoC port for 9261, 9263 and the others
before individual board ports can be fixed.
Just because there is a sudden rush to get things fixed for the next release
should NOT tempt us to get in interim versions.
With Best Regards,
Reinhard
reply other threads:[~2011-06-14 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DF79338.3020908@emk-elektronik.de \
--to=u-boot@emk-elektronik.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox