From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Reinhard Meyer Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:58:32 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] ARM/ATMEL/AT91: rework SoCs 9261/9263 and others Message-ID: <4DF79338.3020908@emk-elektronik.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Friends, I have received several different patches reworking "at91sam*_devices.c" and "at91sam9*.h". Lokking at them, none of them is completely done the way the files for at91sam9260 are done. Examples: 9260, 9263: ATMEL_ID_USART0 9261: ATMEL_ID_US0 9260 uses the CONFIG_AT91_GPIO_PULLUP define, the others do not. 9261 still uses the CONFIG_USARTx defines. Please have a look at at91sam9260 as a reference. We do need a properly fixed SoC port for 9261, 9263 and the others before individual board ports can be fixed. Just because there is a sudden rush to get things fixed for the next release should NOT tempt us to get in interim versions. With Best Regards, Reinhard