From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert ARIBAUD Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 23:19:29 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-atmel/master In-Reply-To: <20110620194341.DC03D11EEDAC@gemini.denx.de> References: <4DFEED7F.1060004@emk-elektronik.de> <4DFF3389.30200@aribaud.net> <20110620134419.D6CF911EEDAC@gemini.denx.de> <4DFF737A.4040202@aribaud.net> <20110620194341.DC03D11EEDAC@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <4DFFB961.7070406@aribaud.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Wolfgang, Le 20/06/2011 21:43, Wolfgang Denk a ?crit : > Dear Albert ARIBAUD, > > In message<4DFF737A.4040202@aribaud.net> you wrote: >> >> I can do a pull request now, but if I did and if Prafulla actually >> wanted the marvell next branch to be pulled in ARM master for inclusion >> in 2011-06, I'll then have to issue yet another pull req after rc3. >> Would that be ok with you? > > No. I understand MV next branch is not intended to go into this > release. When -rc3 is out, we may create a next branch, where this > can be pulled into. Wolfgang: I am not as convinced as you are about the MV next branch pull request not being intended for this release: the custodian wiki addresses pull requests for master branches only, and considers next branches only as temp storage for commits accepted outside a merge window. Next branches are supposed to be used only to rebase the master the same repo; there is no process, nor reason, reason to ask for a pull of a next branch. So if Prafulla asked for a pull, it may be that he actually wanted a pull into ARM master, somehow mentally squezing the 'rebase MV master onto MV next then ask for a pull of master' process. Prafulla: can you make it clear onto which branch of ARM, master or next, you intend MV next to be pulled? Please let me know before 7:30 GMT+2. Around 8:00 GMT+2 I'll issue a pull request for ARM/master, with or without MV next pulled in. > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk Amicalement, -- Albert.