From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aneesh V <aneesh@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:52:19 +0530
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/22] omap4: add clock support
In-Reply-To: <4E005F9E.8050003@ti.com>
References: <1298893591-17636-1-git-send-email-aneesh@ti.com>
	<1305472900-4004-14-git-send-email-aneesh@ti.com>
	<4E0030F8.6030104@ti.com> <4E003952.30901@ti.com>
	<4E00447B.9070804@ti.com>
	<20110621082048.2311611EEDB1@gemini.denx.de>
	<4E005F9E.8050003@ti.com>
Message-ID: <4E007EEB.4070202@ti.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Tuesday 21 June 2011 02:38 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2011 01:50 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Aneesh,
>>
>> In message<4E00447B.9070804@ti.com> you wrote:
>>>
>>> $ gcc main.c
>>> main.c:5: error: initializer element is not constant
>>> main.c:5: error: (near initialization for ?arr[0]?)
>>> main.c:7: error: initializer element is not constant
>>> main.c:7: error: (near initialization for ?arr[1]?)
>>
>> I have to admit that I don't understand either why this error is
>> raised here; after all, from our understanding of the code these _are_
>> constant addresses.
>>
>> You may want to ask this in a compiler group...
>
> Yes. I will.

I asked in the GCC mailing list and got this reply. That also seems to
explain why the array as a local variable worked.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-06/msg00291.html

best regards,
Aneesh