public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hong Xu <hong.xu@atmel.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] [V2] AT91: Makes AT91SAM9263 SoC build correctly against u-boot-atmel/master
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:16:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E01A4C4.7030601@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DF83A3E.7000804@atmel.com>

ping ...

On 06/15/2011 12:51 PM, Hong Xu wrote:
> Hi Reinhard,
>
> On 06/14/2011 08:43 PM, Reinhard Meyer wrote:
>  > Dear Hong Xu,
>  > > Rework for AT91SAM9263 SoC, makes it build again.
>  > > Based on the work for AT91SAM9260-EK.
>  > >
>  > > Signed-off-by: Hong Xu <hong.xu@atmel.com>
>  > > ---
>  > > arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/lowlevel_init.S | 2 +-
>  > > arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/timer.c | 13 ++
>  > > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h | 2 +-
>  > > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91sam9263.h | 13 ++
>  > > .../arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91sam9263_matrix.h | 146
>  > ++++++--------------
>  > > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91sam9_sdramc.h | 2 +-
>  > > 6 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)
>  > >
>  > > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/timer.c
>  > b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/timer.c
>  > > index a087687..89a01ea 100644
>  > > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/timer.c
>  > > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/timer.c
>  > > @@ -134,3 +134,16 @@ ulong get_tbclk(void)
>  > > {
>  > > return gd->timer_rate_hz;
>  > > }
>  > > +
>  > > +/*
>  > > + * Reset the timer.
>  > > + */
>  > > +void reset_timer(void)
>  > > +{
>  > > + /* TODO: write this code. */
>  > > +}
>  > > +
>  > > +void reset_timer_masked(void)
>  > > +{
>  > > + /* TODO: write this code. */
>  > > +}
>  >
>  > NAK. Those functions were intentionally removed from at91/timer.c
>  > quite a while ago.
>  > If some other code requires them, it must be fixed there.
>  > See also the discussion of the "new timer API" made recently.
>  >
>  > Applied (without at91/timer.c changes) to u-boot-atmel/master.
>
> Thanks for merging the AT91SAM9263 SoC part. What about [PATCH 2/2] [V2]
> AT91: Makes AT91SAM9263-EK build correctly against u-boot-atmel/master ?
>
> BR,
> Hong
>
>  > Best Regards,
>  > Reinhard
>  >
>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-22  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-11  7:31 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] [V2] AT91: Makes AT91SAM9263 SoC build correctly against u-boot-atmel/master Hong Xu
2011-06-11  7:31 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] [V2] AT91: Makes AT91SAM9263-EK " Hong Xu
2011-08-02 11:48   ` Reinhard Meyer
2011-08-02 13:11     ` Reinhard Meyer
2011-06-14 12:43 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] [V2] AT91: Makes AT91SAM9263 SoC " Reinhard Meyer
2011-06-15  4:51   ` Hong Xu
2011-06-22  8:16     ` Hong Xu [this message]
2011-08-02 11:46 ` Reinhard Meyer
2011-08-02 13:11   ` Reinhard Meyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E01A4C4.7030601@atmel.com \
    --to=hong.xu@atmel.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox