From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Waterman Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:15:12 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] Is somebody workin on getting the AT91SAM9G45EKES working on the latest build? In-Reply-To: <657FC3AB549C7F4DB01F4397232ED733A2DACD736C@Exchange2007.techatl.com> References: <657FC3AB549C7F4DB01F4397232ED733A2DACD7347@Exchange2007.techatl.com> <4E0C6CDC.4020806@dawning.com> <657FC3AB549C7F4DB01F4397232ED733A2DACD735E@Exchange2007.techatl.com> <4E0CCF48.4000705@dawning.com> <657FC3AB549C7F4DB01F4397232ED733A2DACD736C@Exchange2007.techatl.com> Message-ID: <4E0DC860.2050904@dawning.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Bill, On 06/30/2011 04:54 PM, William C. Landolina wrote: > I start with Atmel's vanilla first stage boot from NAND. I have a much hacked SDCard boot that works as well and that is where I want to head. My target systems do not have NAND or Dataflash. (I can put NAND on my boards for development but I do not want to ship with NAND.) I see. I have not tried any of the MMC u-boot stuff for my board (a sam9m10g45ek). > I hacked the December release to work, but I know I did some things in the wrong places and in a style that is not Wolfgang-compatible. I stopped working on improving the December release because it was clear that a lot of good things were happening to the MMC framework and the underlying AT91 framework was in flux so it seemed like a good idea to wait until that stabilized before I revisit putting a modern U-Boot on my boards "the right way". Ahh, Wolfgang compatible :). I still haven't really figured out exactly what is actually correct with the AT91 framework code yet. I just started playing with this a few weeks ago. There was a patch a little which back which was the reference implementation for the AT91 framework, but I could not find it when I searched my mail box. > I only have one bank of RAM on my custom target so I didn't test the second bank. On my targets the other EBI interface runs a bunch of slow peripherals. Ah, so dual RAM is no matter for you. Which config header are you using? Naturally, I am using the sam9m10g45ek header, but since you have a slightly different board, which doesn't appear to have a header, how did you proceed? Best regards, Alex -- Alex Waterman Computer Engineer Phone: 215-896-4920 Email: awaterman at dawning.com