public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] arm: add CONFIG_MACH_TYPE option and documentation
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 18:07:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E15D9B5.5000001@aribaud.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E14C020.8030109@compulab.co.il>

Hi Igor,

Le 06/07/2011 22:05, Igor Grinberg a ?crit :
> On 07/06/11 21:53, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>
>> Hi Igor,
>>
>> Le 04/07/2011 11:00, Igor Grinberg a ?crit :
>>> CONFIG_MACH_TYPE can be used to set the machine type number in the
>>> common arm code instead of setting it in the board code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Igor Grinberg<grinberg@compulab.co.il>
>>> ---
>>>    README               |   12 ++++++++++++
>>>    arch/arm/lib/board.c |    5 +++++
>>>    2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/README b/README
>>> index 446966d..a9ccb0a 100644
>>> --- a/README
>>> +++ b/README
>>> @@ -442,6 +442,18 @@ The following options need to be configured:
>>>            crash. This is needed for buggy hardware (uc101) where
>>>            no pull down resistor is connected to the signal IDE5V_DD7.
>>>
>>> +        CONFIG_MACH_TYPE        [relevant for ARM only]
>>> +
>>> +        This option can be used to specify the machine type number
>>> +        as it appears in the ARM machine registry
>>> +        (see http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/).
>>> +        If this option is not defined, then your board code
>>> +        will have to set this up like:
>>> +        gd->bd->bi_arch_number =<mach type>;
>>> +        Note: This option is not suitable if you have multiple
>>> +        boards supported in a single configuration file and the
>>> +        machine type is runtime discoverable.
>>> +
>>>    - vxWorks boot parameters:
>>>
>>>            bootvx constructs a valid bootline using the following
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/board.c b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
>>> index 169dfeb..ee77d05 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/lib/board.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
>>> @@ -451,6 +451,11 @@ void board_init_r (gd_t *id, ulong dest_addr)
>>>
>>>        monitor_flash_len = _end_ofs;
>>>        debug ("monitor flash len: %08lX\n", monitor_flash_len);
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_TYPE
>>> +    bd->bi_arch_number = CONFIG_MACH_TYPE; /* board id for Linux */
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>>        board_init();    /* Setup chipselects */
>>>
>>>    #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_MULTI
>>
>> I don't really see the added value of having this configuration option. It is used in only one place for one line of code, which is a sign to me that it does not bring any substantial benefits.
>
> Well, this is something that came up when I tried to get rid of machine_is_*
> macros (patch 3/3), so we could change/cut/simplify the overgrown mach-types.h
> if we want/need to...

You've read and responded to this thread: 
http://old.nabble.com/-U-Boot--Update-and-Cut-down-mach-types-td31432177.html, 
so you know that mach-types.h should not be changed, cut or simplified, 
but should only be generated from the mach-types list pulled from the 
ARM Linux machine repository just like Linux' mach-types.h is generated 
(though we use the full list whereas Linux uses a reduced list, because 
U-Boot supports some ARM machines which Linux does not). If your goal is 
reducing the size of mach-types.h, there is a branch in u-boot-ti that 
is about this (Sandeep: has it been posted as patches for review?)

> I think there is an added value, may be it is hard to see it right now.

If it is hard to see, then maybe it is too small a value to be worth the 
effort -- that's what I am trying to sort out.

> If we have this option and it is documented, then any new board can use it
> instead of thinking (although it is simple) where and how to dereference
> the bi_arch_number.

Not sure I get you there. Can you elaborate on a more precise example 
that would show the benefits of it?

> Also, it can come in handy, in the configuration system (I think it is called Kbuild?),
> so the value can be chosen from the list or something.

AFAICT, the Linux build system does fine with the generated mach-type.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-07 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-04  9:00 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] arm: add CONFIG_MACH_TYPE option and documentation Igor Grinberg
2011-07-04  9:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] arm: nvidia and smdk6400: use common code for machine type Igor Grinberg
2011-07-04  9:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] arm: omap: innovator: " Igor Grinberg
2011-07-04 21:06 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] arm: add CONFIG_MACH_TYPE option and documentation Christopher Harvey
2011-07-04 22:03   ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-04 22:03     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-04 22:16   ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-07-05 14:08     ` charvey at matrox.com
2011-07-05 15:12       ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-05  7:10   ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-06 18:53 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-06 20:05   ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-07 16:07     ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2011-07-07 16:51       ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-07 17:46         ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-07 21:06           ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-13  5:52             ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-14 14:10               ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-14 14:20                 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-14 14:57                   ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-14 15:45                     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] arm: add CONFIG_MACH_TYPE setting " Igor Grinberg
2011-07-17  6:56                       ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-17  9:10                         ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-17  9:08                       ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-27 10:31                       ` Chander Kashyap
2011-07-27 13:04                         ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-28  6:41                           ` Chander Kashyap
2011-07-28  7:59                             ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-28  8:19                               ` Chander Kashyap
2011-07-28  8:58                                 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-08-04 12:05                                   ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-08-11  4:16                                     ` Chander Kashyap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E15D9B5.5000001@aribaud.net \
    --to=albert.u.boot@aribaud.net \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox