[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/9] arm: adjust PLATFORM_LIBS for SPL

Aneesh V
2011-07-19T10:38:39Z

Hi Albert,

On Tuesday 19 July 2011 02:51 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Daniel / Aneesh,
>
> Le 18/07/2011 18:09, Daniel Schwierzeck a ?crit :
>> From: Aneesh V<aneesh@ti.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh V<aneesh@ti.com>
>> Cc: Albert ARIBAUD<albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
>> ---
>> Changes since RFC v1:
>> - none
>>
>> arch/arm/config.mk | 11 ++++++++---
>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/config.mk b/arch/arm/config.mk
>> index 788d4c1..9184d06 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/config.mk
>> +++ b/arch/arm/config.mk
>> @@ -56,9 +56,14 @@ PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += $(call cc-option,\
>>
>> # For EABI, make sure to provide raise()
>> ifneq (,$(findstring -mabi=aapcs-linux,$(PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS)))
>> -# This file is parsed several times; make sure to add only once.
>> -ifeq (,$(findstring arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o,$(PLATFORM_LIBS)))
>> -PLATFORM_LIBS += $(OBJTREE)/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o
>> +# This file is parsed several times, with or without CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
>> set
>> +# Make sure to add only once and with the correct prefix

How about something like this:

# This file is parsed many times, so the string may get added multiple
# times. Also, the prefix needs to be different based on whether
# CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is defined or not. 'filter-out' the existing entry
# before adding the correct one.

>> +ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
>> +PLATFORM_LIBS := $(SPLTREE)/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o \
>> + $(filter-out %/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o, $(PLATFORM_LIBS))
>> +else
>> +PLATFORM_LIBS := $(OBJTREE)/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o \
>> + $(filter-out %/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o, $(PLATFORM_LIBS))
>> endif
>> endif
>
> Seems like the two issues of parsing several times and of parsing with
> or without SPL are independent, so please rephrase the comment to
> clearly separate both points; and as for the "make sure... several
> times" point, please change comment to point the reader to the use of
> filter-out (i.e., one should read "making sure that... by using
> 'filter-out'").

filter-out helps to avoid both problems.

best regards,
Aneesh