From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Graeme Russ <graeme.russ@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:01:36 +1000
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7]Timer: Simplify API
In-Reply-To: <4E214D97.2000009@aribaud.net>
References: <1309261269-4363-1-git-send-email-graeme.russ@gmail.com>	<1310732140-5174-1-git-send-email-graeme.russ@gmail.com>
	<4E203BB8.80003@gmail.com> <4E214D97.2000009@aribaud.net>
Message-ID: <4E215370.2090203@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Albert,

On 16/07/11 18:36, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Greame,
> 
> Le 15/07/2011 15:08, Graeme Russ a ?crit :
> 
>> Oh dear, it looks like Patchwork does not honour 'in-reply-to'. It has
>> created new patches rather than updating the existing ones :(
> 
> I'm not sure patchwork is supposed to honor the in-reply between patch
> versions. BTBW, is there a rationale or other documentation on the behavior
> of patchwork somewhere?

I should! - The whole point of me painstakingly getting the in-reply-to
correct for each individual patch was so they would track correctly
everywhere (inbox, list archive, patchwork). Oh Well

Regards,

Graeme