From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aneesh V Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:14:49 +0530 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/12] omap: add basic SPL support In-Reply-To: References: <1298893591-17636-1-git-send-email-aneesh@ti.com> <1310820802-24984-10-git-send-email-aneesh@ti.com> <4E2193DC.8040207@googlemail.com> <20110716150255.2742017E88AA@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <4E240091.701@ti.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Monday 18 July 2011 03:12 PM, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote: > Dear Wolfgang, > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Daniel Schwierzeck, >> >> In message<4E2193DC.8040207@googlemail.com> you wrote: >>> >>> But CONFIG_SYS_SPL_TEXT_BASE seems to be the right name for this option. >>> Shall I fix it in the SPL framework patches? >> >> This is getting a very long name - and if we do this, we probably have >> to rename a few other CONFIG_SPL_* into CONFIG_SYS_SPL_* as well. >> >> If you are not really, really convinced this must be renamed I suggest >> we stick with the shorter CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE instead... > > ok I won't change the SPL patches. So CONFIG_SPL_* is the new prefix > for all SPL specific config options? Ok. I will change my patch to use CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE then. br, Aneesh