From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aneesh V <aneesh@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:35:25 +0530
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 00/12] U-Boot MMC SPL for OMAP4
In-Reply-To: <20110718135019.6747117A3205@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1298893591-17636-1-git-send-email-aneesh@ti.com>
	<1310820802-24984-1-git-send-email-aneesh@ti.com>
	<4E24375D.1000800@ti.com>
	<20110718135019.6747117A3205@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <4E243DA5.4080802@ti.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Wolfgang,

On Monday 18 July 2011 07:20 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Aneesh V,
>
> In message<4E24375D.1000800@ti.com>  you wrote:
>>
>> I think I have addressed all the comments you and others had on the
>> previous series and adapted it to the new SPL framework.
>
> Yes, I agree.
>
>> There are just two comments for this series so far. I have to omit the
>> 'SYS' from CONFIG_SYS_SPL_TEXT_BASE and a minor comment by Simon.
>
> That's my understanding, too.

One minor question. For the OMAP spl I have some cofig flags like

CONFIG_SYS_SPL_STACK, CONFIG_SYS_SPL_BSS_START_ADDR etc.

Is it ok to omit the 'SYS' part of these too?

>
>> If I fix these two, is it ready to go. Do you have any other comments.
>> If not, shall I re-spin the next revision?
>
> Please feel free to send the next version, without the RFC part in the
> subject now.  If no complaints come in, I want to pull this in soon.

Thanks. Will send in the next revision soon.

best regards,
Aneesh