From: Aneesh V <aneesh@ti.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] i.MX51: FEC: Cache coherency problem?
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:46:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E245C5C.4030303@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110718171836.67bfe605@archvile>
Hi David,
On Monday 18 July 2011 08:48 PM, David Jander wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am busy debugging a problem with the i.MX51 FEC ethernet driver, that
> stopped working after upgrading u-boot. Before the upgrade I used
> v2010.06-rc3, which worked fine.
> I gave up on trying to find the difference beween the old version and this one
> that broke it.... due to BSP issues, git bisecting seems a monumental task I
> am not considering yet.
> The funny part is that it seems to work fine if I disable data-caches!
> With data caches enabled, it hangs in the following while loop in fec_send(),
> at line 592:
>
> ...
> 584 /*
> 585 * Enable SmartDMA transmit task
> 586 */
> 587 fec_tx_task_enable(fec);
> 588
> 589 /*
> 590 * wait until frame is sent .
> 591 */
> 592 while (readw(&fec->tbd_base[fec->tbd_index].status)& FEC_TBD_READY) {
> 593 udelay(1);
> 594 }
> ...
>
> If I change this code in the following way, the while loop exits successfully:
>
> ...
> 584 /*
> 585 * Enable SmartDMA transmit task
> 586 */
> 587 flush_cache(&fec->tbd_base[fec->tbd_index], 4);
> 588 fec_tx_task_enable(fec);
> 589 flash_dcache_all();
> 590
> 591 /*
> 592 * wait until frame is sent .
> 593 */
> 594 while (readw(&fec->tbd_base[fec->tbd_index].status)& FEC_TBD_READY) {
> 595 udelay(1);
> 596 }
> ...
>
> Notice the cache flush calls at line 587 and 589. With these, sending
> succeeds. The driver still hangs in receiving afterwards, but at least this
> part seems to work. If I remove either of the two added lines, it stops
> working again.
>
> What is going on here? Why did this work with caches enabled before??
Are you sure caches were enabled before? Until recently absence of
CONFIG_SYS_DCACHE_OFF did not mean that your D-cache is enabled because
you also had to call the function dcache_enable(). Some platforms were
calling this from board file or some drivers but not all.
The following patch changed this for ARM:
commit c2dd0d45540397704de9b13287417d21049d34c6
armv7: integrate cache maintenance support
In this patch I added a call to dcache_enable() at the beginning of
board_init_r() for ARM(i.e. as soon as relocation is over). As a result
D-cache will be enabled for all ARM platforms now unless
CONFIG_SYS_DCACHE_OFF is set.
Looks like this is a real coherency issue that is brought out because
d-cache is really enabled for you now.
best regards,
Aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-18 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-18 15:18 [U-Boot] i.MX51: FEC: Cache coherency problem? David Jander
2011-07-18 16:16 ` Aneesh V [this message]
2011-07-19 7:26 ` David Jander
2011-07-19 11:07 ` Matthias Weißer
2011-07-19 11:17 ` David Jander
2011-07-19 11:20 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-07-19 12:10 ` David Jander
2011-07-20 6:29 ` David Jander
2011-07-20 8:56 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-20 9:21 ` David Jander
2011-07-20 10:29 ` Aneesh V
2011-07-20 11:31 ` David Jander
2011-07-20 12:05 ` Aneesh V
2011-07-19 11:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-07-19 14:31 ` Matthias Weißer
2011-07-19 11:51 ` Aneesh V
2011-07-18 16:55 ` Stefano Babic
2011-07-19 7:44 ` David Jander
2011-07-19 8:21 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-19 8:37 ` David Jander
2011-07-19 8:43 ` Aneesh V
2011-07-19 8:58 ` David Jander
2011-07-19 9:11 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-19 11:50 ` Aneesh V
2011-07-19 11:42 ` Aneesh V
2011-07-19 9:05 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-19 14:36 ` J. William Campbell
2011-07-19 15:17 ` David Jander
2011-07-19 18:14 ` Anton Staaf
2011-07-19 20:11 ` J. William Campbell
2011-07-20 13:02 ` Albert ARIBAUD
[not found] ` <4E26DF9D.5070709@comcast.net>
[not found] ` <4E26E7AA.9070001@aribaud.net>
2011-07-20 15:36 ` J. William Campbell
2011-07-21 6:48 ` David Jander
2011-07-23 13:04 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-23 15:35 ` J. William Campbell
2011-07-20 8:37 ` Aneesh V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E245C5C.4030303@ti.com \
--to=aneesh@ti.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox