From: "Matthias Weißer" <weisserm@arcor.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] i.MX51: FEC: Cache coherency problem?
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:31:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E259542.2070502@arcor.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110719111909.A239B17E88C9@gemini.denx.de>
Am 19.07.2011 13:19, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> Dear =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Matthias_Wei=DFer?=,
>
> In message<4E256588.4010301@arcor.de> you wrote:
>>
>> Is this really a good idea? This will break a couple of boards using
>> non-cache-aware drivers. And there are a couple of them in u-boot. I
>> think d-cache should be opt-in rather then opt-out as long as there are
>> any drivers which didn't handle cached memory regions correct. i-cache
>> is much less problematic and can be enabled by default.
>
> If we do this, then everybody will just be lazy, and nothing will ever
> change.
You are right. But time is a limited resource. And fixing cache related
issues is a bit more complex then, for example, the simple changes
needed when relocation was introduced in ARM.
>> If d-cache will be enabled by default on ARM I think I have to send a
>> patch for one of my boards :-)
>
> Why don't you just help identifying and fixing the problems in the
> misbehaving drivers?!?
>
> That would be a _much_ more helpful approach.
Well, that is what I meant. I have to fix the driver then. But this will
interfere with the fact that time is a lim.... You know ;-)
If both of my boards are in mainline I will take a look at them and try
to fix problematic drivers (mainly USB OHCI should be the problem)
Regards
Matthias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-19 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-18 15:18 [U-Boot] i.MX51: FEC: Cache coherency problem? David Jander
2011-07-18 16:16 ` Aneesh V
2011-07-19 7:26 ` David Jander
2011-07-19 11:07 ` Matthias Weißer
2011-07-19 11:17 ` David Jander
2011-07-19 11:20 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-07-19 12:10 ` David Jander
2011-07-20 6:29 ` David Jander
2011-07-20 8:56 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-20 9:21 ` David Jander
2011-07-20 10:29 ` Aneesh V
2011-07-20 11:31 ` David Jander
2011-07-20 12:05 ` Aneesh V
2011-07-19 11:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-07-19 14:31 ` Matthias Weißer [this message]
2011-07-19 11:51 ` Aneesh V
2011-07-18 16:55 ` Stefano Babic
2011-07-19 7:44 ` David Jander
2011-07-19 8:21 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-19 8:37 ` David Jander
2011-07-19 8:43 ` Aneesh V
2011-07-19 8:58 ` David Jander
2011-07-19 9:11 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-19 11:50 ` Aneesh V
2011-07-19 11:42 ` Aneesh V
2011-07-19 9:05 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-19 14:36 ` J. William Campbell
2011-07-19 15:17 ` David Jander
2011-07-19 18:14 ` Anton Staaf
2011-07-19 20:11 ` J. William Campbell
2011-07-20 13:02 ` Albert ARIBAUD
[not found] ` <4E26DF9D.5070709@comcast.net>
[not found] ` <4E26E7AA.9070001@aribaud.net>
2011-07-20 15:36 ` J. William Campbell
2011-07-21 6:48 ` David Jander
2011-07-23 13:04 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-23 15:35 ` J. William Campbell
2011-07-20 8:37 ` Aneesh V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E259542.2070502@arcor.de \
--to=weisserm@arcor.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox