From: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/6] Drop obsolete at91rm9200 support
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:53:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E273239.10201@emk-elektronik.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311018069-60651-1-git-send-email-andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
Dear Wolfgang,
On 18.07.2011 21:41, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
> The series "ARM: remove broken boards" deletes the last few boards which used
> the obsolete arm920t/at91rm9200 arch code.
> This series completes it and removes the now obsolete at91rm9200 arch code
> completely. Additionally ther are some more cleanup in documentation and
> surrounding code.
>
> This series applies on top of the "ARM: remove broken boards".
>
> Andreas Bie?mann (6):
> ARM: remove obsolete at91rm9200
> MAKEALL: remove obsolete at91rm9200 soc
> a/a/c/arm920t/cpu.c: remove CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY warning
> README.at91-soc: remove AT91(RM9200) joining notice
> net/eth.c: drop obsolete at91rm9200 support
> README: fix arm920t/at91 path
>
> MAKEALL | 1 -
> README | 2 +-
> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/Makefile | 56 --
> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/bcm5221.c | 232 ------
> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/dm9161.c | 225 ------
> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ether.c | 316 --------
> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/i2c.c | 192 -----
> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ks8721.c | 249 -------
> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/lowlevel_init.S | 169 -----
> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/lxt972.c | 192 -----
> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/reset.c | 71 --
> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/spi.c | 151 ----
> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/timer.c | 160 ----
> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/usb.c | 53 --
> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/cpu.c | 4 -
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91rm9200/AT91RM9200.h | 812 ---------------------
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91rm9200/hardware.h | 75 --
> doc/README.at91-soc | 22 -
> net/eth.c | 4 -
> 19 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2985 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/Makefile
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/bcm5221.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/dm9161.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ether.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/i2c.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ks8721.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/lowlevel_init.S
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/lxt972.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/reset.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/spi.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/timer.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/usb.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91rm9200/AT91RM9200.h
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91rm9200/hardware.h
>
I think it would be good to apply those patches removing the old,
superseded at91rm9200 files to master instead of next.
Would that be ok?
Best Regards,
Reinhard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-20 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-18 19:41 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/6] Drop obsolete at91rm9200 support Andreas Bießmann
2011-07-18 19:41 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] ARM: remove obsolete at91rm9200 Andreas Bießmann
2011-07-18 19:48 ` Andreas Bießmann
2011-07-18 20:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-07-18 20:23 ` Andreas Bießmann
2011-07-18 19:41 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] MAKEALL: remove obsolete at91rm9200 soc Andreas Bießmann
2011-07-18 19:41 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/6] a/a/c/arm920t/cpu.c: remove CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY warning Andreas Bießmann
2011-07-18 19:41 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] README.at91-soc: remove AT91(RM9200) joining notice Andreas Bießmann
2011-07-18 19:41 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/6] net/eth.c: drop obsolete at91rm9200 support Andreas Bießmann
2011-07-18 19:41 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] README: fix arm920t/at91 path Andreas Bießmann
2011-07-20 19:53 ` Reinhard Meyer [this message]
2011-07-20 19:56 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/6] Drop obsolete at91rm9200 support Wolfgang Denk
2011-07-21 12:05 ` Reinhard Meyer
2011-07-23 13:41 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-24 8:14 ` Reinhard Meyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E273239.10201@emk-elektronik.de \
--to=u-boot@emk-elektronik.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox