From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Reinhard Meyer Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:53:29 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/6] Drop obsolete at91rm9200 support In-Reply-To: <1311018069-60651-1-git-send-email-andreas.devel@googlemail.com> References: <1311018069-60651-1-git-send-email-andreas.devel@googlemail.com> Message-ID: <4E273239.10201@emk-elektronik.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Wolfgang, On 18.07.2011 21:41, Andreas Bie?mann wrote: > The series "ARM: remove broken boards" deletes the last few boards which used > the obsolete arm920t/at91rm9200 arch code. > This series completes it and removes the now obsolete at91rm9200 arch code > completely. Additionally ther are some more cleanup in documentation and > surrounding code. > > This series applies on top of the "ARM: remove broken boards". > > Andreas Bie?mann (6): > ARM: remove obsolete at91rm9200 > MAKEALL: remove obsolete at91rm9200 soc > a/a/c/arm920t/cpu.c: remove CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY warning > README.at91-soc: remove AT91(RM9200) joining notice > net/eth.c: drop obsolete at91rm9200 support > README: fix arm920t/at91 path > > MAKEALL | 1 - > README | 2 +- > arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/Makefile | 56 -- > arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/bcm5221.c | 232 ------ > arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/dm9161.c | 225 ------ > arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ether.c | 316 -------- > arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/i2c.c | 192 ----- > arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ks8721.c | 249 ------- > arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/lowlevel_init.S | 169 ----- > arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/lxt972.c | 192 ----- > arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/reset.c | 71 -- > arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/spi.c | 151 ---- > arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/timer.c | 160 ---- > arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/usb.c | 53 -- > arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/cpu.c | 4 - > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91rm9200/AT91RM9200.h | 812 --------------------- > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91rm9200/hardware.h | 75 -- > doc/README.at91-soc | 22 - > net/eth.c | 4 - > 19 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2985 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/Makefile > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/bcm5221.c > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/dm9161.c > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ether.c > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/i2c.c > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ks8721.c > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/lowlevel_init.S > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/lxt972.c > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/reset.c > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/spi.c > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/timer.c > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/usb.c > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91rm9200/AT91RM9200.h > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91rm9200/hardware.h > I think it would be good to apply those patches removing the old, superseded at91rm9200 files to master instead of next. Would that be ok? Best Regards, Reinhard