From: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] arm: add CONFIG_MACH_TYPE setting and documentation
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:59:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E3116D9.2040009@compulab.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANuQgHFZgvDeEKLQgCZGPjT-V6NoVv_CyvR6j_pYLT5K=Apo=w@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/28/11 09:41, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> Dear Igor,
>
>
> On 27 July 2011 18:34, Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il> wrote:
>> On 07/27/11 13:31, Chander Kashyap wrote:
>>> dear Igor,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14 July 2011 21:15, Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il> wrote:
>>>> CONFIG_MACH_TYPE is used to set the machine type number in the
>>>> common arm code instead of setting it in the board code.
>>>> Boards with dynamically discoverable machine types can still set the
>>>> machine type number in the board code.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2: Document the option as mandatory.
>>>> Move the bi_arch_number setting to board_init_f()
>>>>
>>>> README | 10 ++++++++++
>>>> arch/arm/lib/board.c | 4 ++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/README b/README
>>>> index 446966d..0b6802d 100644
>>>> --- a/README
>>>> +++ b/README
>>>> @@ -442,6 +442,16 @@ The following options need to be configured:
>>>> crash. This is needed for buggy hardware (uc101) where
>>>> no pull down resistor is connected to the signal IDE5V_DD7.
>>>>
>>>> + CONFIG_MACH_TYPE [relevant for ARM only][mandatory]
>>>> +
>>>> + This setting is mandatory for all boards that have only one
>>>> + machine type and must be used to specify the machine type
>>>> + number as it appears in the ARM machine registry
>>>> + (see http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/).
>>>> + Only boards that have multiple machine types supported
>>>> + in a single configuration file and the machine type is
>>>> + runtime discoverable, do not have to use this setting.
>>>> +
>>>> - vxWorks boot parameters:
>>>>
>>>> bootvx constructs a valid bootline using the following
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/board.c b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
>>>> index 169dfeb..9901694 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/lib/board.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
>>>> @@ -281,6 +281,10 @@ void board_init_f (ulong bootflag)
>>>>
>>>> gd->mon_len = _bss_end_ofs;
>>>>
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_TYPE
>>>> + gd->bd->bi_arch_number = CONFIG_MACH_TYPE; /* board id for Linux */
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +
>>> bd structure is not initialised by this time.
>>> It leads to u-boot hanging for my board.
>>> I fixed this problem but modifying it. Below is the patch attached for the same.
>> Then how does it work for boards setting the gd->bd->bi_arch_number
>> in board_early_init_f() function?
> can you please point out any board which sets in board_early_init_f() ?
board/esd/otc570/otc570.c
Also, I don't think we should restrict setting it to board_init() and later functions.
>>>> for (init_fnc_ptr = init_sequence; *init_fnc_ptr; ++init_fnc_ptr) {
>>>> if ((*init_fnc_ptr)() != 0) {
>>>> hang ();
>>>> --
>>>> 1.7.3.4
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> U-Boot mailing list
>>>> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
>>>> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>>>>
>>> >From d8df2f0ca9f08470c0cb88307fea4a66f41147a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@linaro.org>
>>> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:10:59 +0530
>>> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Fix wrong initialisation of bi_arch_number
>>>
>>> bi_arch_number is initialised using
>>> @arch/arm/lib/board.c
>>> \#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_TYPE
>>> gd->bd->bi_arch_number = CONFIG_MACH_TYPE; /* board id for Linux */
>>> \#endif
>>>
>>> bd structure is not intialized by this time.
>>> This leads to u-boot hanging when CONFIG_MACH_TYPE is defined.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/lib/board.c | 7 +++----
>>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/board.c b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
>>> index bcbf697..98a9bcc 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/lib/board.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
>>> @@ -281,10 +281,6 @@ void board_init_f (ulong bootflag)
>>>
>>> gd->mon_len = _bss_end_ofs;
>>>
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_TYPE
>>> - gd->bd->bi_arch_number = CONFIG_MACH_TYPE; /* board id for Linux */
>>> -#endif
>>> -
>>> for (init_fnc_ptr = init_sequence; *init_fnc_ptr; ++init_fnc_ptr) {
>>> if ((*init_fnc_ptr)() != 0) {
>>> hang ();
>>> @@ -380,6 +376,9 @@ void board_init_f (ulong bootflag)
>>> gd->bd = bd;
>>> debug ("Reserving %zu Bytes for Board Info at: %08lx\n",
>>> sizeof (bd_t), addr_sp);
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_TYPE
>>> + gd->bd->bi_arch_number = CONFIG_MACH_TYPE; /* board id for Linux */
>>> +#endif
>> This is problematic...
>> There are boards that rely on this setting in early init function calls.
>> For them it should be set before the init_sequence array is run.
>> I will rethink this once again.
> as per my understanding board_init_f() is the first initialisation call.
Yes, but there is the init_sequence[] array, which calls early board functions...
Also your proposed patch moves the initialization of bi_arch_number inside
#ifndef CONFIG_PRELOADER which is IMHO not right.
--
Regards,
Igor.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-28 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-04 9:00 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] arm: add CONFIG_MACH_TYPE option and documentation Igor Grinberg
2011-07-04 9:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] arm: nvidia and smdk6400: use common code for machine type Igor Grinberg
2011-07-04 9:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] arm: omap: innovator: " Igor Grinberg
2011-07-04 21:06 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] arm: add CONFIG_MACH_TYPE option and documentation Christopher Harvey
2011-07-04 22:03 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-04 22:03 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-04 22:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-07-05 14:08 ` charvey at matrox.com
2011-07-05 15:12 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-05 7:10 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-06 18:53 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-06 20:05 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-07 16:07 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-07 16:51 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-07 17:46 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-07 21:06 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-13 5:52 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-14 14:10 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-14 14:20 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-14 14:57 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-14 15:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] arm: add CONFIG_MACH_TYPE setting " Igor Grinberg
2011-07-17 6:56 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-17 9:10 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-17 9:08 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-07-27 10:31 ` Chander Kashyap
2011-07-27 13:04 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-07-28 6:41 ` Chander Kashyap
2011-07-28 7:59 ` Igor Grinberg [this message]
2011-07-28 8:19 ` Chander Kashyap
2011-07-28 8:58 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-08-04 12:05 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-08-11 4:16 ` Chander Kashyap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E3116D9.2040009@compulab.co.il \
--to=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox