public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot] toolchain for u-boot
@ 2011-07-30  9:06 Angelo Dureghello
  2011-07-30 11:05 ` Wolfgang Wegner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Angelo Dureghello @ 2011-07-30  9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

hi all,

i have some issues with an mcf5307 (coldfire, see my previous post of 38 Jul).

I am now suspecting of some differences in the toolchain.

Is there a specific gcc toolchain (or gcc version) required to build u-boot ?

thanks
angelo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] toolchain for u-boot
  2011-07-30  9:06 [U-Boot] toolchain for u-boot Angelo Dureghello
@ 2011-07-30 11:05 ` Wolfgang Wegner
  2011-07-30 11:47   ` Angelo Dureghello
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Wegner @ 2011-07-30 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Hi Angelo,

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:06:56AM +0200, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> hi all,
> 
> i have some issues with an mcf5307 (coldfire, see my previous post of 38 Jul).
> 
> I am now suspecting of some differences in the toolchain.
> 
> Is there a specific gcc toolchain (or gcc version) required to build u-boot ?

I had good results using CodeSourcery Light (don't remember the exact version,
something from 2009) for MCF5373 and MCF54455 in early 2010.

Unfortunately I am currently not working on it any more.

Best regards,
Wolfgang

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] toolchain for u-boot
  2011-07-30 11:05 ` Wolfgang Wegner
@ 2011-07-30 11:47   ` Angelo Dureghello
  2011-07-30 14:49     ` Angelo Dureghello
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Angelo Dureghello @ 2011-07-30 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On 30/07/2011 13:05, Wolfgang Wegner wrote:
> Hi Angelo,
> 
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:06:56AM +0200, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
>> hi all,
>>
>> i have some issues with an mcf5307 (coldfire, see my previous post of 38 Jul).
>>
>> I am now suspecting of some differences in the toolchain.
>>
>> Is there a specific gcc toolchain (or gcc version) required to build u-boot ?
> 
> I had good results using CodeSourcery Light (don't remember the exact version,
> something from 2009) for MCF5373 and MCF54455 in early 2010.
> 
> Unfortunately I am currently not working on it any more.
> 
> Best regards,
> Wolfgang
> 

many thanks,

i have a very strange issue:

on a timer interupt i ger a vector 3 error:

_int_handler:
	// commeneted all, only rte left, exception in rte

	rte



*** Unexpected exception ***
Vector Number: 3  Format: 04  Fault Status: 4

PC: 00fe910a    SR: 00002000    SP: 00ed8af0
D0: 00002c1b    D1: 0000001b    D2: 00400000    D3: 00ee8b76
D4: ffc12d08    D5: ffffffff    D6: 00ffad57    D7: 00ee8b76
A0: 00ee8b76    A1: 00fe9604    A2: 00ee8bc6    A3: 00ffd400
A4: 00ff8167    A5: 00ffbb00    A6: 00ed8b48


there is nothing inside the interrupt handler, so there would be apparently any reason to get the exception on "rte", so my only suspect is about toolchain/compiler.

every help is welcome


Reagards,
angelo
 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] toolchain for u-boot
  2011-07-30 11:47   ` Angelo Dureghello
@ 2011-07-30 14:49     ` Angelo Dureghello
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Angelo Dureghello @ 2011-07-30 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On 30/07/2011 13:47, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> On 30/07/2011 13:05, Wolfgang Wegner wrote:
>> Hi Angelo,
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:06:56AM +0200, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
>>> hi all,
>>>
>>> i have some issues with an mcf5307 (coldfire, see my previous post of 38 Jul).
>>>
>>> I am now suspecting of some differences in the toolchain.
>>>
>>> Is there a specific gcc toolchain (or gcc version) required to build u-boot ?
>>
>> I had good results using CodeSourcery Light (don't remember the exact version,
>> something from 2009) for MCF5373 and MCF54455 in early 2010.
>>
>> Unfortunately I am currently not working on it any more.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Wolfgang
>>
> 
> many thanks,
> 
> i have a very strange issue:
> 
> on a timer interupt i ger a vector 3 error:
> 
> _int_handler:
> 	// commeneted all, only rte left, exception in rte
> 
> 	rte
> 
> 
> 
> *** Unexpected exception ***
> Vector Number: 3  Format: 04  Fault Status: 4
> 
> PC: 00fe910a    SR: 00002000    SP: 00ed8af0
> D0: 00002c1b    D1: 0000001b    D2: 00400000    D3: 00ee8b76
> D4: ffc12d08    D5: ffffffff    D6: 00ffad57    D7: 00ee8b76
> A0: 00ee8b76    A1: 00fe9604    A2: 00ee8bc6    A3: 00ffd400
> A4: 00ff8167    A5: 00ffbb00    A6: 00ed8b48
> 
> 
> there is nothing inside the interrupt handler, so there would be apparently any reason to get the exception on "rte", so my only suspect is about toolchain/compiler.
> 
> every help is welcome
> 
> 
> Reagards,
> angelo
>  

I found something interesting:

_int_handler:
	rts

seems to work, execution return to board_init_r, even if still the command console seems locked.

_int_handler:
	rte

generate the exception above.

Seems that @ SP there is the "next" return address instead of the vector/format/status values.


Any help is really appreciated.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-30 14:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-30  9:06 [U-Boot] toolchain for u-boot Angelo Dureghello
2011-07-30 11:05 ` Wolfgang Wegner
2011-07-30 11:47   ` Angelo Dureghello
2011-07-30 14:49     ` Angelo Dureghello

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox