* [U-Boot] toolchain for u-boot @ 2011-07-30 9:06 Angelo Dureghello 2011-07-30 11:05 ` Wolfgang Wegner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Angelo Dureghello @ 2011-07-30 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot hi all, i have some issues with an mcf5307 (coldfire, see my previous post of 38 Jul). I am now suspecting of some differences in the toolchain. Is there a specific gcc toolchain (or gcc version) required to build u-boot ? thanks angelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] toolchain for u-boot 2011-07-30 9:06 [U-Boot] toolchain for u-boot Angelo Dureghello @ 2011-07-30 11:05 ` Wolfgang Wegner 2011-07-30 11:47 ` Angelo Dureghello 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Wolfgang Wegner @ 2011-07-30 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Angelo, On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:06:56AM +0200, Angelo Dureghello wrote: > hi all, > > i have some issues with an mcf5307 (coldfire, see my previous post of 38 Jul). > > I am now suspecting of some differences in the toolchain. > > Is there a specific gcc toolchain (or gcc version) required to build u-boot ? I had good results using CodeSourcery Light (don't remember the exact version, something from 2009) for MCF5373 and MCF54455 in early 2010. Unfortunately I am currently not working on it any more. Best regards, Wolfgang ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] toolchain for u-boot 2011-07-30 11:05 ` Wolfgang Wegner @ 2011-07-30 11:47 ` Angelo Dureghello 2011-07-30 14:49 ` Angelo Dureghello 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Angelo Dureghello @ 2011-07-30 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 30/07/2011 13:05, Wolfgang Wegner wrote: > Hi Angelo, > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:06:56AM +0200, Angelo Dureghello wrote: >> hi all, >> >> i have some issues with an mcf5307 (coldfire, see my previous post of 38 Jul). >> >> I am now suspecting of some differences in the toolchain. >> >> Is there a specific gcc toolchain (or gcc version) required to build u-boot ? > > I had good results using CodeSourcery Light (don't remember the exact version, > something from 2009) for MCF5373 and MCF54455 in early 2010. > > Unfortunately I am currently not working on it any more. > > Best regards, > Wolfgang > many thanks, i have a very strange issue: on a timer interupt i ger a vector 3 error: _int_handler: // commeneted all, only rte left, exception in rte rte *** Unexpected exception *** Vector Number: 3 Format: 04 Fault Status: 4 PC: 00fe910a SR: 00002000 SP: 00ed8af0 D0: 00002c1b D1: 0000001b D2: 00400000 D3: 00ee8b76 D4: ffc12d08 D5: ffffffff D6: 00ffad57 D7: 00ee8b76 A0: 00ee8b76 A1: 00fe9604 A2: 00ee8bc6 A3: 00ffd400 A4: 00ff8167 A5: 00ffbb00 A6: 00ed8b48 there is nothing inside the interrupt handler, so there would be apparently any reason to get the exception on "rte", so my only suspect is about toolchain/compiler. every help is welcome Reagards, angelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] toolchain for u-boot 2011-07-30 11:47 ` Angelo Dureghello @ 2011-07-30 14:49 ` Angelo Dureghello 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Angelo Dureghello @ 2011-07-30 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 30/07/2011 13:47, Angelo Dureghello wrote: > On 30/07/2011 13:05, Wolfgang Wegner wrote: >> Hi Angelo, >> >> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:06:56AM +0200, Angelo Dureghello wrote: >>> hi all, >>> >>> i have some issues with an mcf5307 (coldfire, see my previous post of 38 Jul). >>> >>> I am now suspecting of some differences in the toolchain. >>> >>> Is there a specific gcc toolchain (or gcc version) required to build u-boot ? >> >> I had good results using CodeSourcery Light (don't remember the exact version, >> something from 2009) for MCF5373 and MCF54455 in early 2010. >> >> Unfortunately I am currently not working on it any more. >> >> Best regards, >> Wolfgang >> > > many thanks, > > i have a very strange issue: > > on a timer interupt i ger a vector 3 error: > > _int_handler: > // commeneted all, only rte left, exception in rte > > rte > > > > *** Unexpected exception *** > Vector Number: 3 Format: 04 Fault Status: 4 > > PC: 00fe910a SR: 00002000 SP: 00ed8af0 > D0: 00002c1b D1: 0000001b D2: 00400000 D3: 00ee8b76 > D4: ffc12d08 D5: ffffffff D6: 00ffad57 D7: 00ee8b76 > A0: 00ee8b76 A1: 00fe9604 A2: 00ee8bc6 A3: 00ffd400 > A4: 00ff8167 A5: 00ffbb00 A6: 00ed8b48 > > > there is nothing inside the interrupt handler, so there would be apparently any reason to get the exception on "rte", so my only suspect is about toolchain/compiler. > > every help is welcome > > > Reagards, > angelo > I found something interesting: _int_handler: rts seems to work, execution return to board_init_r, even if still the command console seems locked. _int_handler: rte generate the exception above. Seems that @ SP there is the "next" return address instead of the vector/format/status values. Any help is really appreciated. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-30 14:49 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-07-30 9:06 [U-Boot] toolchain for u-boot Angelo Dureghello 2011-07-30 11:05 ` Wolfgang Wegner 2011-07-30 11:47 ` Angelo Dureghello 2011-07-30 14:49 ` Angelo Dureghello
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox