From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hong Xu <hong.xu@atmel.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 10:08:06 +0800
Subject: [U-Boot] [STATUS] AT91: boards still broken on 02.Aug.2011
In-Reply-To: <1312292166.31913.73.camel@ubuntu>
References: <1312288661.31913.66.camel@ubuntu> <20110802152353.1435c712@skate>
	<1312292166.31913.73.camel@ubuntu>
Message-ID: <4E38AD86.2020508@atmel.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Reinhard & Thomas,

On 08/02/2011 09:36 PM, Reinhard Meyer wrote:
> Dear Thomas Petazzoni,
>  > Le Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:37:41 +0000,
>  > Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de> a ?crit :
>  >
>  > > Configuring for at91sam9m10g45ek board...
>  >
>  > For this board there are patches from Alex Waterman, sent on June,
>  > 30th. They fix the compilation, and they mostly work (there is an issue
>  > with the Ethernet device, though).
>  >
>  > Since Alex hasn't posted an updated version of his patch set since one
>  > month, should I take his patch set, fix the comments you made at that
>  > time and send an updated version ?
>  >
>  > (I have the AT91SAM9M10G45-EK platform on my desk here).
> Unless Atmel NAKs this approach, I am fine with it.

We're OK with this. If Thomas can fix soon, that's good. Or we'll take 
over and send out the fixes for Soc and board part.

BR,
Eric

> Please re-base them on current u-boot-atmel/master and provide two
> independent patches:
> 1. for the SoC parts
> 2. for the board itself
>
> Thanks,
> Reinhard
>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>