From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:45:42 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PULL REQUEST] u-boot-atmel/master
In-Reply-To: <4E394EBA.2080206@emk-elektronik.de>
References: <1312368313-32160-1-git-send-email-u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
	<4E3949EF.6090606@aribaud.net> <4E394EBA.2080206@emk-elektronik.de>
Message-ID: <4E395F16.7020502@aribaud.net>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Reinhard,

On 03/08/2011 15:35, Reinhard Meyer wrote:
> Dear Albert,
>
>> Overall ARM builds (./MAKEALL arm) went from 199 boards
>> built, 119 with warnings or errors before applying, to 201 boards,
>  > 97 with warnings or errors once applied.
>
> When boards were defined in the MAKEALL apparently only one variant
> was built and counted, whereas in boards.cfg every variant is built.
>
> Amongst that 199 some Atmel boards had been in MAKEALL *and* boards.cfg
> Removing those duplicates but getting more variants tested leads to
> that increase of 2.
>
> On a side note one should make sure that boards are not left in
> MAKEALL when they are moved from Makefile to boards.cfg. Otherwise
> one gets them counted as broken although there is no error or
> warning message seen.

You do well to point this out -- I've just applied a patch that adds 
boards to MAKEALL, but haven't throughly checked boards.cfg, and some 
boards are there as well.

> Best Regards,
> Reinhard
>
>


Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.