* [U-Boot] Nand: Uboot-Environment at bad block
@ 2011-06-20 14:10 Arno Steffen
2011-06-20 14:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-08-04 10:07 ` Daniel Gorsulowski
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arno Steffen @ 2011-06-20 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
In one of my devices, uboot-environment is located at a bad block.
"save
Saving Environment to NAND...
Erasing Nand...
Skipping bad block at 0x000c0000
Writing to Nand... FAILED!"
In my memory mapping I have already reseverd 2blocks.
How can I setup uboot in a way, that it will look at c0000 or (in case
of bad block) at the next block e0000?
In my configs file I found somewhat like:
#define CONFIG_ENV_SIZE (128 << 10) /* 128 KiB */
#define SMNAND_ENV_OFFSET 0xC0000 /* environment starts here */
#define CONFIG_SYS_ENV_SECT_SIZE boot_flash_sec
in mem.c of my processor I found:
f_sec = (128 << 10); /* 128 KiB */
/* env setup */
boot_flash_base = base;
boot_flash_off = f_off;
boot_flash_sec = f_sec;
uboot is based on 2010.03 release.
Maybe someone can give me an advice?
Thanks
- Arno
PS:
Move the base address of environment is not an option, as in next
device the bad block might be on exact this location.
Environment itself is just 2kB, but a block is 128k. Can I decrease
the environment to that size and still use access from linux (via
fw_printenv)?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Nand: Uboot-Environment at bad block
2011-06-20 14:10 [U-Boot] Nand: Uboot-Environment at bad block Arno Steffen
@ 2011-06-20 14:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-06-20 14:49 ` Arno Steffen
2011-08-04 10:07 ` Daniel Gorsulowski
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2011-06-20 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Arno Steffen,
In message <BANLkTimtNJ5Au4uPp2D7q8hZkbk3x5RERA@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
> In one of my devices, uboot-environment is located at a bad block.
> "save
> Saving Environment to NAND...
> Erasing Nand...
> Skipping bad block at 0x000c0000
Why are you reposting the same message just 8 hours after the initial
posting?
Don't do that!!!
Read http://catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html to understand why
this will not help you getting any answer any sooner, on contrary.
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
I think it's a new feature. Don't tell anyone it was an accident. :-)
-- Larry Wall on s/foo/bar/eieio in <10911@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Nand: Uboot-Environment at bad block
2011-06-20 14:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2011-06-20 14:49 ` Arno Steffen
2011-06-20 14:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arno Steffen @ 2011-06-20 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
I am very sorry, apologize me! My fault.
I haven't seen my mail in the mailing archive, so I thought it was
just saved as draft or forget to write [uboot] in subject.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Nand: Uboot-Environment at bad block
2011-06-20 14:49 ` Arno Steffen
@ 2011-06-20 14:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2011-06-20 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Arno Steffen,
In message <BANLkTim_Mt2s1N6U==h2v0LYj6uBWbfWPA@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
> I am very sorry, apologize me! My fault.
> I haven't seen my mail in the mailing archive, so I thought it was
> just saved as draft or forget to write [uboot] in subject.
Where did you look?
DENX: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-June/094640.html
marc: http://marc.info/?l=u-boot&m=130855216329409&w=2
Gmane: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/101775
Seems your message has been corrcectly archived everywhere...
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"I like your game but we have to change the rules."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Nand: Uboot-Environment at bad block
2011-06-20 14:10 [U-Boot] Nand: Uboot-Environment at bad block Arno Steffen
2011-06-20 14:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2011-08-04 10:07 ` Daniel Gorsulowski
2011-08-04 18:02 ` Scott Wood
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Gorsulowski @ 2011-08-04 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Arno Steffen wrote:
> In one of my devices, uboot-environment is located at a bad block.
> "save
> Saving Environment to NAND...
> Erasing Nand...
> Skipping bad block at 0x000c0000
>
> Writing to Nand... FAILED!"
>
> In my memory mapping I have already reseverd 2blocks.
> How can I setup uboot in a way, that it will look at c0000 or (in case
> of bad block) at the next block e0000?
>
...
>
> Maybe someone can give me an advice?
> Thanks
> - Arno
>
...
Hello!
Is there a solution to this problem?
I was going to ask exactly the same question, but then I found this topic.
My board config (ARM platform) is
#define CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NAND 1
#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET 0xC0000
#define CONFIG_ENV_SIZE 0x20000
Now there is a board with a bad block exactly at 0xC0000
=> nand bad
Device 0 bad blocks:
000c0000
02f40000
...
If I try to write the environment, i get
Saving Environment to NAND...
Erasing Nand...
Skipping bad block at 0x000c0000
Writing to Nand... FAILED!
Any hints?
Kind regards
Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Nand: Uboot-Environment at bad block
2011-08-04 10:07 ` Daniel Gorsulowski
@ 2011-08-04 18:02 ` Scott Wood
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2011-08-04 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 08/04/2011 05:07 AM, Daniel Gorsulowski wrote:
> Arno Steffen wrote:
>> In one of my devices, uboot-environment is located at a bad block.
>> "save
>> Saving Environment to NAND...
>> Erasing Nand...
>> Skipping bad block at 0x000c0000
>>
>> Writing to Nand... FAILED!"
>>
>> In my memory mapping I have already reseverd 2blocks.
>> How can I setup uboot in a way, that it will look at c0000 or (in case
>> of bad block) at the next block e0000?
Use CONFIG_ENV_RANGE.
-Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-04 18:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-20 14:10 [U-Boot] Nand: Uboot-Environment at bad block Arno Steffen
2011-06-20 14:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-06-20 14:49 ` Arno Steffen
2011-06-20 14:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-08-04 10:07 ` Daniel Gorsulowski
2011-08-04 18:02 ` Scott Wood
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox