* [U-Boot] [PATCH] mkimage: Fix 'Unknown OMAP image type - 5'
@ 2011-08-05 18:42 Dirk Behme
2011-08-08 11:04 ` Aneesh V
2011-08-08 19:05 ` Albert ARIBAUD
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dirk Behme @ 2011-08-05 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
Using mkimage with e.g.
tools/mkimage -A arm -T firmware -O u-boot -d u-boot.bin foo.img
gives a warning
"Unknown OMAP image type - 5"
while it seems that the image itself is created successfully.
This does come from the patch "mkimage: Add OMAP boot image support".
Reordering the init_xx_image_type() sequence does make this
message go away.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
CC: John Rigby <john.rigby@linaro.org>
CC: Aneesh V <aneesh@ti.com>
CC: Sandeep Paulraj <s-paulraj@ti.com>
---
This is reproducable with the recent mainline mkimage where the
patch "mkimage: Add OMAP boot image support" is applied:
http://git.denx.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=3decb14abe76d244ba98fd158ef95f89e7e37d70
tools/mkimage.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: u-boot.git/tools/mkimage.c
===================================================================
--- u-boot.git.orig/tools/mkimage.c
+++ u-boot.git/tools/mkimage.c
@@ -156,12 +156,12 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
init_imx_image_type ();
/* Init FIT image generation/list support */
init_fit_image_type ();
- /* Init TI OMAP Boot image generation/list support */
- init_omap_image_type();
/* Init Default image generation/list support */
init_default_image_type ();
/* Init Davinci UBL support */
init_ubl_image_type();
+ /* Init TI OMAP Boot image generation/list support */
+ init_omap_image_type();
params.cmdname = *argv;
params.addr = params.ep = 0;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] mkimage: Fix 'Unknown OMAP image type - 5'
2011-08-05 18:42 [U-Boot] [PATCH] mkimage: Fix 'Unknown OMAP image type - 5' Dirk Behme
@ 2011-08-08 11:04 ` Aneesh V
2011-08-08 19:05 ` Albert ARIBAUD
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Aneesh V @ 2011-08-08 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Dirk,
On Saturday 06 August 2011 12:12 AM, Dirk Behme wrote:
> From: Dirk Behme<dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
>
> Using mkimage with e.g.
>
> tools/mkimage -A arm -T firmware -O u-boot -d u-boot.bin foo.img
>
> gives a warning
>
> "Unknown OMAP image type - 5"
>
> while it seems that the image itself is created successfully.
>
> This does come from the patch "mkimage: Add OMAP boot image support".
>
> Reordering the init_xx_image_type() sequence does make this
> message go away.
This solves the problem for me too.
Tested-by: Aneesh V <aneesh@ti.com>
best regards,
Aneesh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] mkimage: Fix 'Unknown OMAP image type - 5'
2011-08-05 18:42 [U-Boot] [PATCH] mkimage: Fix 'Unknown OMAP image type - 5' Dirk Behme
2011-08-08 11:04 ` Aneesh V
@ 2011-08-08 19:05 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-08-09 16:21 ` Dirk Behme
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Albert ARIBAUD @ 2011-08-08 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Dirk,
Le 05/08/2011 20:42, Dirk Behme a ?crit :
> From: Dirk Behme<dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
>
> Using mkimage with e.g.
>
> tools/mkimage -A arm -T firmware -O u-boot -d u-boot.bin foo.img
>
> gives a warning
>
> "Unknown OMAP image type - 5"
>
> while it seems that the image itself is created successfully.
>
> This does come from the patch "mkimage: Add OMAP boot image support".
>
> Reordering the init_xx_image_type() sequence does make this
> message go away.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme<dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
> CC: John Rigby<john.rigby@linaro.org>
> CC: Aneesh V<aneesh@ti.com>
> CC: Sandeep Paulraj<s-paulraj@ti.com>
>
> ---
>
> This is reproducable with the recent mainline mkimage where the
> patch "mkimage: Add OMAP boot image support" is applied:
>
> http://git.denx.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=3decb14abe76d244ba98fd158ef95f89e7e37d70
>
> tools/mkimage.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: u-boot.git/tools/mkimage.c
> ===================================================================
> --- u-boot.git.orig/tools/mkimage.c
> +++ u-boot.git/tools/mkimage.c
> @@ -156,12 +156,12 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
> init_imx_image_type ();
> /* Init FIT image generation/list support */
> init_fit_image_type ();
> - /* Init TI OMAP Boot image generation/list support */
> - init_omap_image_type();
> /* Init Default image generation/list support */
> init_default_image_type ();
> /* Init Davinci UBL support */
> init_ubl_image_type();
> + /* Init TI OMAP Boot image generation/list support */
> + init_omap_image_type();
>
> params.cmdname = *argv;
> params.addr = params.ep = 0;
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Any idea why reordering fixes the issue? Seems to me like init functions
are not / should not be dependent on order, so the "fix" seems fragile
to me, at least as long as we cannot add a good explanation.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] mkimage: Fix 'Unknown OMAP image type - 5'
2011-08-08 19:05 ` Albert ARIBAUD
@ 2011-08-09 16:21 ` Dirk Behme
2011-08-09 16:50 ` John Rigby
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dirk Behme @ 2011-08-09 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 08.08.2011 21:05, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Dirk,
>
> Le 05/08/2011 20:42, Dirk Behme a ?crit :
>> From: Dirk Behme<dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
>>
>> Using mkimage with e.g.
>>
>> tools/mkimage -A arm -T firmware -O u-boot -d u-boot.bin foo.img
>>
>> gives a warning
>>
>> "Unknown OMAP image type - 5"
>>
>> while it seems that the image itself is created successfully.
>>
>> This does come from the patch "mkimage: Add OMAP boot image support".
>>
>> Reordering the init_xx_image_type() sequence does make this
>> message go away.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme<dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
>> CC: John Rigby<john.rigby@linaro.org>
>> CC: Aneesh V<aneesh@ti.com>
>> CC: Sandeep Paulraj<s-paulraj@ti.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> This is reproducable with the recent mainline mkimage where the
>> patch "mkimage: Add OMAP boot image support" is applied:
>>
>> http://git.denx.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=3decb14abe76d244ba98fd158ef95f89e7e37d70
>>
>>
>> tools/mkimage.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: u-boot.git/tools/mkimage.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- u-boot.git.orig/tools/mkimage.c
>> +++ u-boot.git/tools/mkimage.c
>> @@ -156,12 +156,12 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
>> init_imx_image_type ();
>> /* Init FIT image generation/list support */
>> init_fit_image_type ();
>> - /* Init TI OMAP Boot image generation/list support */
>> - init_omap_image_type();
>> /* Init Default image generation/list support */
>> init_default_image_type ();
>> /* Init Davinci UBL support */
>> init_ubl_image_type();
>> + /* Init TI OMAP Boot image generation/list support */
>> + init_omap_image_type();
>>
>> params.cmdname = *argv;
>> params.addr = params.ep = 0;
>> _______________________________________________
>> U-Boot mailing list
>> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
>> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>
> Any idea why reordering fixes the issue?
No, unfortunately not. I looked at the other patches touching this
section of mkimage.c and it looked like everybody is adding new init
functions below the existing ones. And this helped ;)
I hoped that John or Aneesh would comment on this...
> Seems to me like init
> functions are not / should not be dependent on order, so the "fix"
> seems fragile to me, at least as long as we cannot add a good
> explanation.
Yes, I agree.
John? Aneesh? Any idea?
Best regards
Dirk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] mkimage: Fix 'Unknown OMAP image type - 5'
2011-08-09 16:21 ` Dirk Behme
@ 2011-08-09 16:50 ` John Rigby
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: John Rigby @ 2011-08-09 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
>
>> Seems to me like init
>> functions are not / should not be dependent on order, so the "fix"
>> seems fragile to me, at least as long as we cannot add a good
>> explanation.
>
> Yes, I agree.
>
> John? Aneesh? Any idea?
>
The method check_image_type in image_type_params is supposed to just
return success or failure. However, for omap it also calls fprintf:
static int omapimage_check_image_types(uint8_t type)
{
if (type == IH_TYPE_OMAPIMAGE)
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
else {
fprintf(stderr, "Unknown OMAP image type - %x", type);
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
}
I just looked at all the other image checkers and no others have this
so the fix is to simply remove the fprintf. I obviously did not
understand this when I wrote the original.
John
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-09 16:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-05 18:42 [U-Boot] [PATCH] mkimage: Fix 'Unknown OMAP image type - 5' Dirk Behme
2011-08-08 11:04 ` Aneesh V
2011-08-08 19:05 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-08-09 16:21 ` Dirk Behme
2011-08-09 16:50 ` John Rigby
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox