public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aneesh V <aneesh@ti.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] armv7: cache: remove flush on un-aligned invalidate
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:18:32 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4229C0.6090201@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6FioU1i7ymWytPwHFB2x0AC9gg248VXV_HP0SDdH1j4QNACQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Anton,

On Tuesday 09 August 2011 10:09 PM, Anton Staaf wrote:
> I'm not sure what the larger context of this change is, but it seems
> like a bad idea to me.  There are a lot of locations in U-Boot that

Please see this thread for the context.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/105113/focus=105135


> will end up causing an unaligned invalidate (ext2 and dos file system
> code in particular).  And this change will cause those unaligned
> invalidates to possibly throw away stores to adjacent variables.  If

No. Those partial cache-lines on the boundary are left alone. They are
not invalidated. So, it still affects only the party calling the
invalidate.

> you are going to make this change you should at least assert instead
> of just printing a warning.  And there should be a concerted effort to
> clean up the buffer management in U-Boot so that invalidates will
> never be unaligned.  This is also a departure from the cache
> management implementations in the Linux kernel, not that U-Boot has to
> do exactly what they do, but I feel they have the correct
> implementation, from the perspective of ensuring that all stores
> actually make it to main memory.

Yes, I had implemented it in line with the kernel apporach. However,
with un-aligned buffers there is no perfect solution anyway. So, I
don't have a strong opinion on this. Leaving alone the boundary
cache-lines and printing a big warning seems reasonable enough.

best regards,
Aneesh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-10  6:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-01 11:18 [U-Boot] [PATCH v 0/3] arm: changes in cache handling Aneesh V
2011-08-01 11:18 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v 1/3] arm: do not force d-cache enable on all boards Aneesh V
2011-08-01 16:33   ` Jason Liu
2011-08-01 16:46     ` Jason Liu
2011-08-01 19:45       ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-08-01 19:53     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-08-02 14:35       ` Jason Liu
2011-08-02 15:58         ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-08-05 15:07   ` Aneesh V
2011-08-07  6:20     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-08-09 11:10   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] arm: changes in cache handling Aneesh V
2011-08-09 11:25     ` Aneesh V
2011-08-09 11:10   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] arm: do not force d-cache enable on all boards Aneesh V
2011-08-09 11:10   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] omap: enable caches at system start-up Aneesh V
2011-08-09 11:10   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] armv7: stronger barrier for cache-maintenance operations Aneesh V
2011-08-09 11:10   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] armv7: cache: remove flush on un-aligned invalidate Aneesh V
2011-08-09 16:39     ` Anton Staaf
2011-08-10  6:29       ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-08-10  6:48       ` Aneesh V [this message]
2011-08-10 18:11         ` Anton Staaf
2011-08-11  6:29           ` Aneesh V
2011-08-09 11:34   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/4] arm: changes in cache handling Aneesh V
2011-08-09 11:34   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] arm: do not force d-cache enable on all boards Aneesh V
2011-08-09 14:41     ` [U-Boot] d-cache enable Lukasz Majewski
2011-08-12 10:59       ` Aneesh V
2011-08-12 11:41         ` Lukasz Majewski
2011-08-12 12:16           ` Aneesh V
2011-08-12 12:21           ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-08-12 12:32             ` Reinhard Meyer
2011-08-12 12:36               ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-08-12 13:08             ` Lukasz Majewski
2011-08-12 13:19               ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-08-09 11:34   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/4] omap: enable caches at system start-up Aneesh V
2011-08-09 11:34   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/4] armv7: stronger barrier for cache-maintenance operations Aneesh V
2011-08-09 11:34   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/4] armv7: cache: remove flush on un-aligned invalidate Aneesh V
2011-08-11 14:35   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/4] arm: changes in cache handling Aneesh V
2011-08-13 10:09     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-08-15  7:40       ` V, Aneesh
2011-08-11 14:35   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] arm: do not force d-cache enable on all boards Aneesh V
2011-08-14 11:09     ` Simon Guinot
2011-08-15  7:34       ` V, Aneesh
2011-08-16 14:33     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 " Aneesh V
2011-08-11 14:35   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/4] omap: enable caches at system start-up Aneesh V
2011-08-11 14:35   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/4] armv7: stronger barrier for cache-maintenance operations Aneesh V
2011-08-11 14:35   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/4] armv7: cache: remove flush on un-aligned invalidate Aneesh V
2011-08-01 11:18 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v 2/3] omap: enable caches at system start-up Aneesh V
2011-08-01 11:18 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v 3/3] armv7: stronger barrier for cache-maintenance operations Aneesh V
2011-08-05 10:29 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v 0/3] arm: changes in cache handling Aneesh V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E4229C0.6090201@ti.com \
    --to=aneesh@ti.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox