[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] ARM: Clean arch/arm/lib/cache.c

[Hong Xu <hong.xu@atmel.com>]

Hi Marek,

On 08/11/2011 12:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Thursday, August 11, 2011 04:19:45 AM Hong Xu wrote:
>> The default cache operations defined in arch/arm/lib/cache.c
>> do not perform any real cache operation, and instead a WARNING
>> will be emitted.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hong Xu<hong.xu@atmel.com>
>> Tested-by: Elen Song<elen.song@atmel.com>
>> CC: Albert Aribaud<albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
>> CC: Aneesh V<aneesh@ti.com>
>> CC: Marek Vasut<marek.vasut@gmail.com>
>> CC: Reinhard Meyer<u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
>> CC: Heiko Schocher<hs@denx.de>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/lib/cache.c |   55
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 files changed, 31
>> insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/cache.c b/arch/arm/lib/cache.c
>> index 92b61a2..6af05ec 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/lib/cache.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/cache.c
>> @@ -20,36 +20,43 @@
>>    * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston,
>>    * MA 02111-1307 USA
>>    */
>> +#include<linux/compiler.h>
>> +#include<common.h>
>>
>> -/* for now: just dummy functions to satisfy the linker */
>> +#define EMIT_WARNING printf("WARNING: %s - CPU cache operation is not " \
>> +"implemented!\n", __func__)
>
> Maybe use debug() ? Or make the emission of warning conditional, somehow I have
> the feeling this will make some people unhappy.

Just my feelings: It's noisy but it'll give strong message to the user 
even if the DEBUG is not opened :-)

BR,
Eric

> Otherwise looks nice and clean.
>>
>> -#include<common.h>
>> +/*

[...]