[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] macb: initial support for Cadence GEM

["Andreas Bießmann" <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>]

Dear Dave Aldrige,

Am 18.08.2011 15:32, schrieb Dave Aldridge:
> The Cadence GEM is based on the MACB Ethernet controller but has a few
> small changes with regards to register and bitfield placement.  This
> patch detects the presence of a GEM by reading the module ID register
> and setting a flag appropriately.
> 
> This handles the new HW address, USRIO and hash register base register
> locations in GEM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <fovsoft@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/macb.c |   18 +++++++++++-----
>  drivers/net/macb.h |   55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/macb.c b/drivers/net/macb.c
> index c63eea9..d52dda0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/macb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/macb.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ struct macb_dma_desc {
>  
>  struct macb_device {
>  	void			*regs;
> +        int                     is_gem;

is it required to have a runtime distinction here?
I mean is it possible to have a Cadence GEM type and a old style MACB
type of HW on the same device?
If not I would prefer a compile time differentiation here to avoid the
macb_or_gem_(read|write) macros (but lets wait for some comments from
the custodians)

regards

Andreas Bie?mann