[U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM status as of 2011-08-30

Albert ARIBAUD
2011-08-31T10:25:50Z

Le 30/08/2011 21:08, Wolfgang Denk a ?crit :
> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
>
> In message<4E5D088B.7090702@aribaud.net> you wrote:
>>
>> I have just applied Wolfgang's updated ARM board removal patch set.
>>
>> Currently, u-boot-arm/master builds 182 boards, of which:
>>
>> - ELDK4.2 finds 37 boards with warnings or errors ( dnp1110 gcplus lart
>
> I think we should try and separate the errors cases from the warnings
> only ones - those boards with build errors need to be fixed, or
> removed.

Right, but the current MAKEALL output does not make it easy to sort this
out. Maybe we could change MAKEALL to distinguish between error and
warning counts (and produce LOG/*.MAKELOG, LOG/*.ERR and LOG/*.WARN
accordingly).

> We can clean up warnings then, as we go on.

Agreed. However, I'd prefer it if no ARM board produced any warning --
granted, here it *looks like* many of these warnings are inocuous, and
any new toolchain might produce some more, but if we don't keep the
warning count at zero, then a less inocuous warning could creep in
unnoticed.

>> - CodeSourcery 2010q1 finds 100 (!) boards with warnings or errors (
>
> I guess it's additional warnings. You will see even more when using
> ELDK 5.x
>
>> (Cc:ing R?my for USB stuff; for yaffs, I don't know whom I should Cc:)
>
> yeaffs is generic code, i. e. it ends up on my plate.

There you are, then. :)

>> For both CS and ELDK, there are a lot of "arm-linux-ld: stubs.o:
>> compiled for a big endian system and target is little endian
>> arm-linux-ld: failed to merge target specific data of file stubs.o"
>> which I'll look into.
>
> You need a big endian ARM compiler for the ixp systems.

Got it -- actually, it is not a compiler issue, but a library issue: CS
does compile for big-endian as well as little-endian, but does not
provide big-endian libs
(<http://www.codesourcery.com/sgpp/lite/arm/portal/kbentry36>, at least
as I understand it). Apparently ELDK4.2 does not either. Would ELDK5.0
have them? I haven't gotten around to setting it up.

>> Meanwhile, I suggest that the current u-boot-arm/master be considered
>> rc1-ready, with the effort until rc2 focused on finding and fixing
>> code-wide bugs such as those two above.
>
> Agreed.
>
>> If that is ok, I'll send out a pull request today.
>
> Thanks a lot!

Done, with a few hour's delay.

> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk

Amicalement,
--
Albert.