From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert ARIBAUD Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:34:47 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM (Tegra) In-Reply-To: <201108301120.40166.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <4E4D8DB4.6030800@aribaud.net> <201108201450.28657.vapier@gentoo.org> <201108301120.40166.vapier@gentoo.org> Message-ID: <4E5D0317.4080002@aribaud.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Le 30/08/2011 17:20, Mike Frysinger a ?crit : > On Saturday, August 20, 2011 14:50:27 Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Thursday, August 18, 2011 18:09:56 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >>> 1) if there are any pull requests to u-voot-arm/master in the works, >>> please try to submit them soon or at lease let me know, and >> >> we've got some Tegra stuff that seems to be waiting for merging (or at >> least feedback as to anything left that needs to be done so it can be >> merged): [RESEND PATCH v3 0/4] Add basic clock and pinmux functions to the >> Tegra2 >> >> to broach the more general tegra question, should these get sent to Tom and >> then he sends them to Albert, or should they get sent directly to Albert >> (since there is no dedicated tegra or nvidia u-boot tree atm) ? we'd like >> to get this process smoothed out so we dont keep annoying people :). > > ping ... > > if people dont care either way, we can just set up a u-boot/u-boot-tegra.git > tree for Albert to pull from Seems like people don't care, and I'm fine with applying the patches myself, but I don't want to pull from a tree: I'll apply the patches as they appear on patchwork. Are we talking about these four patches? > -mike Amicalement, -- Albert.