From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Schwarz <simonschwarzcor@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:38:13 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] SMDK6400 regression
In-Reply-To: <4E7836F4.7000903@aribaud.net>
References: <1316389174-31117-1-git-send-email-s-paulraj@ti.com>
	<4E76EBFD.9060505@aribaud.net>
	<20110919074710.D0CAD1407967@gemini.denx.de>
	<4E773165.1090304@aribaud.net>
	<BE04C0A3BEC7354A8BCE3DB869F4D49304D6D7@DLEE08.ent.ti.com>
	<4E7836F4.7000903@aribaud.net>
Message-ID: <4E7842E5.6020709@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 09/20/2011 08:47 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
[SNIP]
>
> There is a regression in u-boot-ti/next with respect to u-boot-arm/next,
> on board smdk6400, causing the following build failure:
>
> s3c64xx.c:80: error: static declaration of 'nand_read_buf' follows
> non-static declaration
> /home/uboot/src/u-boot-arm/include/nand.h:139: error: previous
> declaration of 'nand_read_buf' was here
>
> Git bisect finds commit 55f429bb39614a16b1bacc9a8bea9ac01a60bfc8 is the
> cause of the regression.
>
> Copying Simon as the author of the commit, in order to confirm that the
> issue is in smdk6400.
>
> If so, as MAINTAINERS has smdk marked orphaned and its former maintainer
> resigned, I take the ti/next branch in as it is, and if no one steps in
> as a maintainer for SMDK6400 before end of the 2011-12 relea?se merge
> window, I will then apply a board removal patch for it.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Sandeep
>
> Amicalement,

Hi Albert,

will have a look at it.

Regards
Simon